These electoral processes are what the departing colonial masters
foisted on us as they went away, without so much as tuition in how to
run them. FOTOSEARCH
The saying has now become common that doing the same thing the
same way over and over again and expecting to see different results is a
sign of lunacy.
It is repeated by almost everyone
observing others, but we hardly apply the wisdom of that saying to
ourselves, maybe because everybody thinks they are different from all
the rest.
It is funny, because if we lived by that
adage and changed the ways we did things every after a couple of failed
tries, this our world would be a place of permanent mutation and swift
rearrangements that produce new and dynamic situations, in which each
new invention would arrive with its own sell-by date.
But
we are blessed with inertia, the reluctance to do anything we do not
know even when we realise the futility of whatever we are doing, and how
we are doing it, at present.
It is the wisdom of the
comfort zone that may hold very little comfort for us but keeps us going
to the rhythm of ‘better the devil you know’.
My idea
is that the lethargy that keeps us in the same unsatisfactory place
without the dynamism of wanting to change it is what is holding us back
in terms of socio-economic development.
So, I say,
since politics is key to everything in fostering a healthy society, we
must change the way we do politics. One of the things we ought to train
our eyes on would be the way we designate those we want to lead us.
Right now, as matters stand, I do not think we have given this part of political life more than a cursory glance.
The
average voter spends way more time examining a sheep he is going to
slaughter tomorrow than he does examining campaigning candidates and
what they promise him if he gives them his vote.
With
the sheep, he will be scrutinising the sheep’s hooves, horns, wool and
teeth; with the politician, he will be happy to eat and drink to his
satisfaction, and maybe get a pair of khanga, a T-shirt and a cap.
That is enough to persuade the voter that the candidate is fit to guide him and his interests for the coming five years.
In
this way we participate in the “collective imbecilisation” of our
people, stunting their mental growth to the extent that they accept that
we offer ourselves to serve them but at the same time we bribe them so
that they allow us to be their servants.
What idiocy.
What would be our reaction if someone turned up at our gate and offered
to work for us as a gardener and at the same time brought us food and
drinks to persuade us to employ him?
There is clearly a
problem that our political scientists have not addressed, and which our
rulers – current and aspiring — are happy to continue with because it
serves them well. The people do not choose their “leaders,” rather the
so-called leaders choose their people.
Blind reliance
I
argue, thus, that the political systems, especially the electoral
mechanisms, have failed miserably, and our continued blind reliance on
them only proves that we are all raving mad.
It is a
madness that would have been a little more tolerable if it only made us
look a little ridiculous, because ridicule does not kill. But African
elections kill, and that should be of concern for those who rule over
us, but alas.
I suggest that election time in Africa is
the period when levels of integrity are at their lowest and also the
season of unreason.
If we continue along this route for
another fifty years, each of our countries, and the continent
generally, will have managed to make us more corrupt, more belligerent,
more violent, more beastly.
These electoral processes
are what the departing colonial masters foisted on us as they went away,
without so much as tuition in how to run them.
We have pretended we could take them in our stride, but that has been revealed as a fallacy.
It
is high time we thought of alternatives, and we had better do that
before the whole edifice, rotten to the core, comes crumbling around our
ears.
These electoral processes, with all their lying,
dissembling and assassinations only demean us and dehumanise us. And
they do not produce leaders.
Jenerali Ulimwengu is chairman of the board of the Raia Mwema newspaper and an advocate of the High Court in Dar es Salaam. E-mail: ulimwengu@jenerali.com
No comments :
Post a Comment