Let’s all hope that the two
frontrunners in the August 8 presidential contest - President Uhuru
Kenyatta and opposition leader Raila Odinga - will agree to face one
another in the planned televised debates.
Started in 2013, televised presidential debates have become a defining moment in our electioneering calendar.
From
the noisy politics and intemperate exchanges at campaign rallies, you
move the presidential candidates to a forum where members of the public
can assess their sincerity and belief in what they want to achieve and
their deep knowledge of the burning issues of the day.
One
can dismiss the debates as talking shops, but you must agree that when
you bring presidential candidates together at a place where members of
the public can see them shaking hands and hug, hear them exchange
pleasantries, reminisce about the good old days when they worked
together and refer to one another as ‘brother’ on national TV; the
psychological impact can be very huge.
The debates are
what makes it possible for a candidate to psychologically persuade
members of the public that a general election is not that much of a
high-stakes affair that their tribesmen think must be won at all costs.
That is also how you lower political temperatures in the country.
If
you can get a competent moderator able to guide the debate away from
scandal-mongering to pertinent issues of the day, a moderator with the
ability to cleverly navigate the debate and create an environment where
candidates are encouraged to crack jokes, exchange banter and
pleasantries, and where they come through not as ardent enemies dying
for an opportunity to go for each other’s throats- the TV debates can
play a very big role in lowering tension.
However, I am not surprised that Uhuru and Raila have
raised concerns about the format of the TV debates. When we cram the
platform with too many fringe players, you will not have given the
frontrunners enough time to fully ventilate on relevant and pressing
issues of the day.
Personally, I am keen to hear what
the presidential candidates would say about several issues. I want to
hear them discuss the deteriorating state of government finances,
mounting public debts, widespread distress in the banking sector and the
ballooning budget deficit.
How are the presidential
candidates planning to return Kenya to the growth path that was
interrupted by the 2007/08 post-election violence?
Our
economy was growing by seven per cent even before the GDP numbers were
rebased. When you parade too many fringe candidates on the platform to
engage with the frontrunners, the primary purpose of the debate gets
lost.
A presidential debate gives a guide on what policy-making is likely to be.
We
also saw what happened during the debate by Nairobi gubernatorial
candidates where so much space and time was devoted to
scandal-mongering. They threw mud at each other as if it was a race to
determine who was the most corrupt.
When you allow
leaders to trade allegations and accuse each other of corruption in the
manner that these candidates did, you are allowing them to fudge
culpability. It thereforebecomes difficult to pin down the culprits.
Scandal-mongering
by politicians is what feeds public cynicism at even genuine efforts to
fight corruption. And when you pin a politician down on an allegation
that you can’t prove, you encourage dishonesty and deception, which in
turn fuels more suspicion and cynicism.
Where are the
big ideas of the next decade? After trying 10 years of tax and spend- of
expansionary spending- isn’t it time we experimented with austerity?
Which
of the presidential candidates is prepared to wield the axe? Is an
economy based on easy credit and heavy government borrowing going to be
sustainable going forward?
Uhuru and Raila should agree to face one another in a TV debate.
No comments :
Post a Comment