A majority of Kenyans would not mind voting for political
aspirants who splash money and promise them rewards during election
campaigns.
Findings of a survey on voter bribery
tendencies in the country reveal a deeply entrenched habit, with more
than half of the respondents confessing that their choice of candidate
is easily influenced when they are bribed.
At the centre of it are the voters who have no problem giving their votes in exchange for “something small”.
After
all, it appears to be an ‘accepted tradition’ in Kenyan politics, the
respondents argued, pointing to weak enforcement systems and political
parties and institutions that appear to condone the practice.
The
findings are contained in a report titled ‘Voter Bribery as an Election
Malpractice in Kenya; A Survey Report Dec 2016,’ to be officially
launched later this week.
HIGH LEVELS
The findings of the survey carried out by Interthoughts
Consulting and commissioned by the Centre for Multiparty Democracy (CMD)
in partnership with the Konrad Adenauer Foundation, a German political
foundation, point to a high likelihood that voter bribery will still be
witnessed at high levels in the 2017 General Election.
Out
of the 514 respondents from the 10 counties surveyed between April and
June, 2016, 56 per cent confessed to having ever received a bribe from a
political party aspirant or candidate.
From each of
the 10 counties — Nakuru, Bomet, Kiambu, Kisumu, Machakos, Meru, Kilifi,
Migori, Trans-Nzoia and Kakamega — more than 50 per cent confessed that
they would easily give their vote to the person who gave them something
or promised to reward them.
Bomet County had the
highest proportion of respondents who had ever received a bribe at 64.71
per cent followed by Kisumu, Nakuru, Kakamega, Kilifi, Trans Nzoia,
Kiambu and Machakos while Migori had the lowest at 41.51 per cent.
DISHING OUT HANDOUTS
Various
forms of voter bribery were identified in the survey, ranging from
frequent fundraisers (harambees) during the period preceding elections
and during campaign periods to dishing out handouts to the voters.
It
is also during this time that you will see aspirants jostling to pay
school fees and hospital bills and even take care of funeral expenses,
particularly to the voters who the politicians had probably avoided and
kept off in the past.
Politicians also make promises of individual direct benefits in varying rewards, from jobs to tenders.
They
will also pay a sum of money for people who attend their political
meetings in form of transport reimbursements and allowances and some
will also give out clothes such as t-shirts and lessos in the name of
electoral material.
Some aspirants or candidates also pay for opinion polls, influencing the process and results of the same.
10 COUNTIES
This is the first survey on voter bribery tendencies in the country, showing perceptions and challenges to address them.
Findings
were based on debates and discussions that involved voters, aspirants,
political parties and opinion leaders in the 10 counties visited.
Questionnaires were also administered to 514 respondents.
There
was a strong agreement that refusing to collect the bribe to vote was
an individual responsibility, with Kisumu leading at 80 per cent
followed by Kiambu at 73.81 per cent and Nakuru at 70 per cent.
Some
of the respondents, however, said even though they had received bribes
from aspirants for political offices and other elective seats, they may
not necessarily vote for them.
LOST CAUSE
The
indication was that they would collect bribes but vote for persons of
their choice, pointing to a society that is struggling with values,
morals and ethics.
According to some of the
respondents, they will collect the money for other reasons as long as
the aspirants are in the business of dishing it out.
The
survey points out that some of those receiving money may not even be
registered voters or members of the aspirant’s party while others may be
registered far away from the aspirants area, hence cannot vote for
them.
Of interest is that there was a high level of
awareness that voter bribery is an electoral malpractice and a form of
corruption, hence a punishable crime.
CORRUPTION
On
the other hand, however, respondents argue that precedence has been set
in previous elections, and experience has shown that persons who engage
in voter bribery have not been convicted.
Many
respondents also felt that almost all the candidates seeking elective
seats engage in corruption, hence their choices are limited.
In some cases, it is the citizens themselves who demand to be given something.
On the spot are political parties, aspirants and their agents who seem to be the drivers of the malpractice.
Many
aspirants are moneyed and able to meet the electoral needs. High
poverty and low income levels among citizens, especially youths who have
no gainful employment were cited as some factors that encourage the
malpractice.
EXCHANGING HANDS
But
there is also legal instruments and policies and institutions which
have failed to nib the problem in the bud, resulting in weak enforcement
of existing laws, which leave culprits going Scot free.
Many
Kenyans also have a strong mentality of money exchanging hands for
votes, and this is based on experiences in previous elections held over
the years.
But CMD warns that while people tend to
choose those who have money thinking they are best placed to care of
them, the aspirants may have corruptly obtained the money and so easily
give it out.
They will, however, still recover the money corruptly, once elected, resulting in a cycle.
“It
was clear to them that voter bribery influences how the people vote and
results into people electing leaders who are evidently corrupt by
having bribed the voters in the first place and hence likely to sustain
their very nature of being corrupt even after being elected,” the report
to be launched on Friday states.
No comments :
Post a Comment