By GEORGE OMONDI, omondi@ke.nationmedia.com
In Summary
- Citi says the process of determining a joint opposition candidate is likely to undermine unity of the proposed super alliance.
- Cord has been working to build a super alliance bringing together other opposition figures.
- Jubilee has, on the other hand, dissolved most of its affiliates to operate as a formal party.
A last-minute attempt to build a broad-based
coalition has increased the risk of a fallout among opposition parties
and raised chances of the ruling Jubilee to retain power, global
financial advisory firm Citi says.
The firm says in a report that the process of determining a
joint opposition candidate is likely to undermine unity of the proposed
super alliance.
“Our central scenario is that with the ruling
Jubilee Party continuing to maintain a united front, while the
opposition alliance remains subject to internal divisions, this is
probably an election that is Jubilee’s to lose,” says the report titled,
‘‘Elections loom large: What to think about in East Africa as Kenya
heads to the polls in August 2017’’.
The Coalition for Reforms and Democracy (Cord) led
by former prime minister Raila Odinga, former vice-president Kalonzo
Musyoka and Senator Moses Wetang’ula has been working to build a super
alliance bringing together other opposition figures, among them, former
vice-president Musalia Mudavadi.
Jubilee has, on the other hand, dissolved most of
its affiliates to operate as a formal party with President Uhuru
Kenyatta as the presidential candidate and Deputy President William Ruto
his running mate.
“We expect Mr Odinga to be the presidential
candidate, but we see a three-way contest between Mr Mudavadi, Mr
Musyoka and Mr Wetang’ula to be the vice-presidential candidate”,
states the report.
Recent victory by opposition parties in a number of
sub-Saharan Africa have, however, provided lessons that Cord could
easily use to win the August 8 elections, the report says.
Opposition parties have recently won polls in Ghana, Gambia, Cote d’Ivoire, Nigeria and Senegal.
“If 2016 has taught us one political lesson, it may
be that we should not discount the possibility of a surprise outcome,”
David Cowan, Citi’s Africa economist, writes in the report.
“In the case of Kenya, a last minute defection of
one of the parties in one of the two main election alliances to the
other side or to a new alliance.”
The analysts see the shadow of the 2008 violence
still looming large as politicians continue to stoke ethnic tensions in
the ongoing voter registration drive.
“But we are still of the view that the most likely
outcome is that violence would be limited, sporadic, and associated
mostly with poor urban youths.” says the report.
“We think that this (violence) could be relatively easily contained.”
“We think that this (violence) could be relatively easily contained.”
The report, however, foresees high chances of
widespread unrest at county level triggered by close outcomes among
rivals from same political coalitions with Kajiado, Marsabit, Meru,
Mombasa, Narok and Kwale being cited as hotspots.
The report concludes: “Thinking about Kenyan politics, there are some concerns, but they should not be overstated.”
No comments :
Post a Comment