Money Markets
By DAVID HERBLING, hdavid@ke.nationmedia.com
In Summary
Treasury secretary Henry Rotich has reinstated
withholding value added tax (VAT), making a U-turn on its supposed
repeal in January.
The recently assented to Finance Bill 2016 has re-introduced
six per cent withholding VAT, and backdated the effective date to
January 19, in what is likely to hit suppliers and commercial property
owners and tenants.
Withholding VAT allows the taxman to collect six
per cent of the levy in advance at the point of payment for suppliers,
with the remaining 10 per cent being paid in due course.
Shitul Shah, a partner at Daly & Inamdar
Advocates, said the comeback of withholding VAT is meant to improve
government cash flow given that it allows the government to collect the
levies beforehand through withholding agents.
“I think it is more of a strategy to improve cash flow,” said Mr Shah in an interview with the Business Daily.
The Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) has consistently
failed to meet its revenue targets amid increased State expenditure on a
bloated civil service, devolved units, infrastructure, and debt
repayments — and the shortfall has occasionally resulted in a biting
cash crisis in government.
Going forward, for instance, supplies to a sacco
appointed as a VAT withholding agent will see a trader deducted six per
cent levy at the point of payment for direct payment to KRA and the
remaining 10 per cent payable by the trader.
The changes carried in the Bill bring to an end a
nine-month tussle between the taxman and tax experts, with the KRA
insisting that withholding VAT was still applicable.
But the Tax Procedures Act (2015) had earlier
deleted provisions in the VAT Act that allowed the use of agents,
effectively nullifying withholding VAT, tax experts argued.
The ensuing impasse left former withholding VAT
agents and suppliers of taxable supplies in a quandary and Mr Rotich’s
move offers clarity to the market.
Mr Rotich’s about-turn now allows KRA to ride on
parastatals, banks, credit unions, contractors and insurance companies
among others to act as agents to collect the tax.
However, tax experts have questioned the validity
of backdating withholding VAT saying it is likely to create a legal and
financial crisis for taxpayers.
“A key question is whether the retrospective
amendment, which imposes an obligation and potential penalties for
non-compliance can stand the legal test,” analysts at KPMG said in a
research note.
“In any event, the law requires withholding VAT
agents to withhold VAT when making payments, an obligation that cannot
apply to payments made between 19 January 2016 and the publication of
the Finance Act 2016 when there were no enabling provisions.”
No comments :
Post a Comment