Customers queue for service at a Family Bank branch in Nairobi. Photo/FILE
By Kiarie Njoroge, gkiarie@ke.nationmedia.com
In Summary
- Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) Keriako Tobiko asked the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) to interrogate the seven Family Bank managers and record their statements as suspects in the theft of Sh791 million from the National Youth Service.
- If charged and found guilty under the Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act, they face imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years or a fine not exceeding Sh5 million or the amount of the value of the property involved in the offence, whichever is the higher, or to both the fine and imprisonment.
- Earlier investigations had indicated that the Sh791 million was first transferred to a Family Bank account held by a supplies company — Form Home Builders — from where it was then re-distributed to 20 accounts in different banks.
Seven Family Bank managers were Wednesday placed
under investigation for their role in the theft of Sh791 million from
the National Youth Service (NYS).
Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) Keriako Tobiko asked
the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) to interrogate the
seven and record their statements as suspects in the theft.
The seven individuals Mr Tobiko wants investigated
include Robert Oscar Nyaga (branch manager), Josephine Njeri Waira
(branch customers service supervisor), Martin Kagiri (operations
supervisor), Meldon Onyango (relationship manager) and Nancy Njambi, the
platinum manager and head of risk and compliance department.
They all worked in the bank’s KTDA Plaza branch.
If charged and found guilty under the Proceeds of
Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act, they face imprisonment for a term
not exceeding 14 years or a fine not exceeding Sh5 million or the amount
of the value of the property involved in the offence, whichever is the
higher, or to both the fine and imprisonment.
Earlier investigations had indicated that the Sh791
million was first transferred to a Family Bank account held by a
supplies company — Form Home Builders — from where it was then
re-distributed to 20 accounts in different banks.
Mr Tobiko also put the bank under investigation to
determine whether it complied with laws relating to money laundering and
proceeds of crime.
Financial institutions are required to report any
transaction above $10,000 (Sh1 million) or its equivalent in any other
currency as well as any complex, unusual or suspicious transaction to
the Financial Reporting Centre (FRC).
“I direct that the investigations being carried out
by FRC/Central Bank to determine whether there was non-compliance by
Family Bank with provisions of the Central Bank Act; the Banking Act;
and Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act and the regulations
there under be completed and the file submitted within seven days for
perusal and appropriate action,” Mr Tobiko said in a letter circulated
to newsrooms.
The Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act
requires banks to report large volumes of money transacted and “pay
attention to all unusual patterns of transactions, and to insignificant
but periodic patterns of transactions which have no apparent economic
or lawful purpose.”
The Act says that if convicted, a body corporate
is liable “to a fine not exceeding Sh10 million or the amount of the
value of the property involved in the offence, whichever is the higher.”
Reacting to Mr Tobiko’s directive, Family Bank said
that it has always acted in strict adherence and in compliance with the
provisions of the Central Bank Act; the Banking Act and the Proceeds
of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act.
In a statement, the bank said that the funds were
transferred into its customer accounts through Central Bank of Kenya via
the real-time gross settlement systems ( RTGS) used by all banks.
The NYS scandal first came to light in June after
it was reported that Sh791 million had been irregularly transferred
from NYS’ Integrated Financial Management System (IFMIS) accounts to
Form Home Builders.
The Banking Fraud Investigation Unit (BFIU) has
already frozen the 20 accounts belonging to a number of companies, law
firms and individuals believed to have received a share of the money.
No comments :
Post a Comment