Opinion and Analysis
By RICHARD MUNANG and JESICA ANDREWS
In Summary
The devastating effects of climate change are already being felt across the planet, including in Africa.
The 2011 drought-induced famine in the Horn of Africa
affected more than 10 million people, claimed 257,000 lives and cost
more than $1 billion (Sh89.3 billion) in damages.
The recent Africa Adaptation Gap Report by
the United Nations Environment Programme (Unep) warns that climate
change could reduce total crop yields in sub-Saharan Africa by as much
as 20 per cent by 2070. Worse still, it could begin to affect Africa’s
trade potential.
For example, a projected sea-level rise in Tanzania
of 70 centimetres by 2070 could devastate the port city of Dar es
Salaam, its largest and richest city and a major player in East Africa
trade, and cost the country about $10 billion (Sh892.8 billion) in
property damages and related losses. Environmentalists warn that rising
sea levels could cause severe flooding, submerge land and destroy
coastal ecosystems.
Is Africa under a climate change siege? Can the
region expand its trade under current conditions? Experts say yes to
both questions, but, in addition to reducing barriers to new and
existing trade, countries will have to use their ecosystems to protect
the continent’s productive sectors from the negative impact of climate
change.
Resilient ecosystems are required to promote the
wise use of biodiversity and natural inputs. Such wise use will preserve
the natural environment from degradation and ensure that it remains
productive and continues to contribute to economic development.
With the World Bank stressing that food production
for rapidly growing urban and rural populations will be the largest
growth opportunity for African farmers, the agricultural sector must
come up with climate-proof strategies.
While Africa currently produces staple food worth
$50 billion (Sh4.5 trillion) per year, the bank has found that the
region could add an extra $20 billion (Sh1.8 trillion) annually if it
dismantles trade barriers in agriculture. For example, West Africa could
cut its transport costs by half in less than a decade if its
agricultural trade policies were designed to serve as building blocks
rather than as roadblocks to economic growth, says the bank.
Additionally, as climate change worsens, industries
and agriculture will need to respond. Experts recommend increased
production of environmental goods and services (EGS) as a viable option.
The EGS are benefits that can be derived from healthy ecosystems and
include clean air, fresh water, purification of air and water from
forests, pollination of crops and groundwater recharge through wetlands.
Valued at $690 billion (Sh61.6 trillion) in 2006,
increasing global demand for EGS could be worth $1.9 trillion (Sh169.6
trillion) by 2020, according to Unep.
To boost trade, therefore, experts stress the need
to diversify exports beyond commodities and for governments to initiate
policies that allow more people to participate in trade. But does
sustainable use of ecosystems accomplish this goal?
“Rethinking possibilities” is the phrase
development experts use to reinforce the point that it is possible to
use natural resources as productive assets. By using ecosystem services
properly, Africa could protect its natural resources and increase its
trade volume within the continent and with the rest of the world. And
such protection comes with minimal or no additional costs.
A few ecosystem approaches, such as the use of
“native pollinators,” are already gaining popularity. Also referred to
as “the farmer befriending the bee,” this approach presumes bees’
habitats are protected when farmers minimise tillage, allow crops to
flower, plant hedgerows or windbreaks with flowering shrubs, reduce or
eliminate pesticide use and work with surrounding land owners to protect
natural areas.
By investing in the protection of bees’ natural
habitats, farmers are investing in their crops. Bees and the sustainable
use of other management techniques can increase crop yields by as much
as five per cent, according to the Proceedings B journal, published by the Royal Society of Biological Sciences.
Moreover, these techniques reward farmers with
better-quality produce to sell. For example, in Burkina Faso, where shea
nuts are the second-most-exported cash crop (after cotton),
ecosystem-based techniques could improve the quality of shea nuts and
ensure sustainable production methods.
No comments :
Post a Comment