The issue of per diem is often a contentious one. It is misunderstood
and also abused. Even though this daily allowance an organisation gives
an individual to cover expenses when on official trip is intended to
motivate employees, sometimes it breeds discontent. PHOTO/FILE
Joe, the CEO of a state corporation, was
attending a strategic planning workshop at a Five Star hotel in
Mombasa, facilitated by consultants from a firm he held in high esteem.
On
the second day as he stood by the entrance of the conference hall to
make a call before the start of the morning session, he spotted the lead
consultant alighting from a rickety motor cycle taxi, commonly known as
boda boda.
Taken by surprise, he scurried back into
the hall. He didn’t want the consultant to notice the shock on his face.
To him, it was a travesty of this consultant’s stature and what he
represented.
That the senior consultant from such a
‘big’ organisation should arrive at such a high level meeting on a boda
boda was something he just could not wrap his brains around.
Joe
was to further learn from one of his junior employees that the
consultant was actually putting up in the modest hotel that they (Joe’s
junior staff) stayed in.
Instantaneously, Joe started
getting a different picture of the consultancy firm he only a few
minutes back held highly. The reputation of the consultant’s employer
was apparently at stake.
Guess what the culprit was:
per diem. Yes, that daily allowance that the organisation offers staff
on a working trip carries with it some serious weight. That’s why
knowing organisations spend a good amount of time working out the
figures.
The issue of per diem is often a contentious one. It is misunderstood and also abused.
Even
though this daily allowance an organisation gives an individual to
cover expenses when on official trip is intended to motivate employees,
sometimes it breeds discontent.
And if poorly worked out, it can dent the image of an organisation image.
Patricia
Nyokabi, an organisational psychologist, explains that the whole issue
about per diem boils down to the age old question of making the
employees feel that the organisation takes their interest at heart.
OBSESSION WITH BOTTOM LINES
“Make the employee feel he is taken care of and he will reciprocate by taking care of the company’s interests,” she says.
Trouble
sets in when an organisation offers unreasonably low per diem, or have
policies that lead to inexplicable differences in the amounts offered to
staff headed the same destination.
When designing per
diem, argues Nyokabi, responsible managers must focus on maintaining a
good company image as much as they are eager not to overshoot the
budgets.
Some obsessions with bottom lines, says
Nyokabi, might end up costing the company huge in the long run. For
instance, she suggests, “Joe’s company may decide that the consulting
firm it is working with is not of the calibre it wants to do business
with.”
Ideally, per diem should be designed to
sufficiently comfort staff away from home on official duty. By
extension, it also demonstrates how well an organisation takes care of
its employees.
In many cases, employees from the same
organisation attending the same meeting are allocated different per diem
depending on their job grade and responsibility.
A
lot of times, the differences court controversy, as the managing
consultant of Inspiration Management Consultants Elisha Odhiambo,
agrees.
He explains though that this arises from the perceived differences in the needs of the staff in different job grades.
“The
level of mannerisms and grooming is different between the different
cadres of employees,” he reckons. “It is the natural law of things.”
Last
year, Boston University School of Public Health released the findings
of a study investigating the perceptions of per diem in the health
sector.
It revealed that there were concerns about the
ways in which per diem policies were affecting work practices, among
them being the distrust that lower-level workers felt toward their
superiors. Allowances were perceived to provide unfair financial
advantages to already better-off and well-connected staff.
Among
other issues raised, the study recommended that organisations should
control discretion in the application of per diem and increase
transparency in policy implementation.
Indeed, some
organisations have a standard framework of how much they pay across the
different grades. Often, such organisations would restrict where their
employees spend the night while on a formal trip.
This
is where image comes in. It is to avoid a situation in which employees
go in search of cheaper than par accommodation to save money. And where
expensive equipment is concerned, the restriction in selection of
accommodation facilities helps to further ensure that the security of
company property, and sometimes even information, is not compromised.
No comments :
Post a Comment