By EDWARD OMETE
The ongoing changes in the health sector pose a
serious challenge to facilities, mostly private owned ones. That said,
even public facilities will be affected by the same issues.
The recent directive banning levying of fees on
certain services, especially in relation to outpatients, makes matters
worse. The most affected public facilities are dispensaries and health
centres. These two have previously financed their operations by a mix of
money from the National Hospital Insurance Fund (NSSF) and small user
fees.
Having been intimately involved in primary
healthcare level facilities for the last two years, my view is that
while the intention is good the repercussions will be detrimental.
I have come across stellar examples in the
generation and use of fees generated by these facilities. The truth is
that money allocated by the government will never be enough to sustain
operations of small facilities, especially those that were built by
through the Community Development Fund or money donated by faith-based
organisations and NGOs.
It remains to be seen what the results of the new
directive will be. While the expected allotment by the Health ministry
is expected to rise on the back of the directive, the general rule in
public healthcare financing is that a shilling raised on the ground
would do better than every Sh2 given by Treasury.
This is because self-generated funds have a
target use and exhibit more fiscal discipline in their use. They are
also prone to less interruptions or delays in disbursement as is the
case with most Treasury funds.
For the private sector, the ever ballooning wage
bill will rise even further. Two factors point to this: fewer top cadre
workers are available — many having opted to remain or return to
public service. Many more are now venturing into entrepreneurship (one
in every five express the wish to have a private business).
The demand-supply curve is shifting towards
smaller private facilities as they have “friendlier terms”. The usual
raising of user fees will not work any more as even insurance premiums
will reach a ceiling beyond which further raises will lead to loss of
clients.
What models then? Most of the facilities have
training institutions that also act as a pool of workers from which they
can hire. This is usually nursing and other junior cadre courses, but
currently only one or two major hospitals have started their own medical
schools. For private facilities, this avenue is one of the few
salvation routes. Demand for the courses is high while supply is short.
As a premium course the value of returns is also
high. The only challenge may be capital for setting up ventures, but
even this should not be challenging.
Given an opportunity, many Kenyans would invest in
medical training facilities, especially schools. Such health facilities
can also directly invest in existing privately owned institutions to
increase brand visibility or make them more professional.
This should not be the only route to be pursued.
They should also think of setting up medical research units,
collaborating with other stakeholders in auxiliary medical services
provision to increase their revenues. This will relieve the strain on
their wage bills.
It is noteworthy that some are “selling” extra
capacity of the services they offer like medical waste disposal.
Emergency vehicle lease to external players is another example of
revenue generation. Adoption of new survival techniques is a must.
No comments :
Post a Comment