Allowing early access to pension saving could expose individual
savers or insured members to more risk of making the wrong decisions than less
flexible systems. If insured members are allowed early access to their pension
funds they could be faced with making complex choices which might negatively
impact on their future levels of retirement income. For example, today Tanzania
social security policy’s regulations of 2003, is stating that people will be allowed
to access 25% of their pension contributions as a tax free lump sum before
reaching 55 or 60 years. It seems that in many cases people prefer to withdraw
their lump sums without being properly informed of the impact this would have
on their final pension pot size. For sure this will put them at risk of ‘having less than they expect to live on
in retirement.’
Because of this risk, early access options may need to be
accompanied by a system of financial information (or possibly regulated advice)
to educate the general public members or insured people with their family
members about the implications of accessing pension savings early. Such an
information system could be an added expense as it is not currently part of the
SSRA’s considerations for the design of personal accounts, though the SSRA will
be required attempting to ensure that a comprehensive system of generic
information is available to all individuals. Public or private pension
providers and workplace providers will be required to choose whether to make
financial information and advice available to members of their pension schemes
and some have started to do, but others will be required to provide only
generic information in an effort to keep management charges low.
Contributions in most defined benefit schemes are pooled into one
investment fund, which means it could be difficult for defined benefit schemes
to offer early access. In a defined benefit scheme it could be difficult to
determine the value of an individual’s accrued benefits, which are in part
based on future earnings. Taking money early from a defined benefit fund could
reduce the value of the whole pooled fund, and potentially have an adverse
effect on other scheme members. Therefore early access could be difficult for defined benefit schemes to
incorporate since does not have individual member account as it is permitted in
provident funds or like the former National Provident Fund (NPF) before being
transformed into a comprehensive social security fund (NSSF) which operates
under social insurance principles.
There is the potential for a run on a defined benefit pension fund
if people respond to rumours of trouble with the fund by wanting to access
their fund early. In the public sector, most defined benefit schemes are contributory
and unfunded and allowing early access in these schemes could represent a
cash-flow cost to the Government. Because of the potential difficulties for
early access to pension savings in defined benefit schemes, early access in
other countries is often only permitted in defined contribution schemes or
provident funds. In summary, introducing early access options could encourage
more people to save, existing insured members to contribute in higher amounts
and could appeal to women, younger people and men and women on low incomes and
in particular for majority Tanzanians who have not covered with social security
protection.
However, Wananchi need to access their pension savings early risk
lowering the size that their pension pot will be on retirement though this risk
could be mitigated by the increase in savings that providing early access
options might generate. Introducing early access could lead to a greater
complexity in the management of the existing public pension funds. This greater
complexity could lead to higher management fees which, in their turn, could
contribute to reducing the size of the pension pot that savers or insured
people receive on retirement.
No comments :
Post a Comment