Dar es Salaam —
Tanzania can improve its ranking in budget transparency by timely
publishing information on its
budget processes, a new report suggests.
The Open Budget
Survey (OBS) stresses that it is crucial to publish the Executive's
Budget Proposal and In-Year Reports online in a timely manner as part of
the requirements for raising openness.
OBS is part of the
International Budget Partnership's Open Budget Initiative, a global
research and advocacy programme to promote public access to budget
information and the adoption of accountable budget systems.
These budget
transparency recommendations come as Tanzania's ranking in the global
survey has deteriorated, according to the Open Budget Survey 2019. The
report is the latest and confirms that the country's status has been on
the decline since 2015.
"All volumes of the
budget books should be posted online in draft form, as submitted to the
National Assembly, before the budget is approved. The Executive's
Budget Proposal should be published at least in advance of the budget
being approved by the legislature," reads in part the report.
It suggests that
the In-Year Reports should be published within three months of the end
of the respective reporting periods. It also recommends to "produce and
publish the Mid-Year Review and Year-End Report online in a timely
manner."
Also Read
Francis Nanai leaves Mwananchi Communications Limited (MCL)
Israeli mining magnate dodged US sanctions in DRC deals: report
Aga Khan, AFD ink Sh700m infectious malady control bid
Tanzania is currently listed as among countries which provide insufficient or no information about budget.
For instance, the
Executive's Budget Proposal for 2018/19 which was submitted by the
executive to the legislature for approval was only available in hard
copy, the report states.
The In-Year Reports
which include information on actual revenues collected, actual
expenditures made, and debt incurred at different intervals; issued
quarterly or monthly, was produced late in 2017/18 and 2018/19, while
the Mid-Year Review that gives update on the implementation of the
budget was not produced.
The year-end report
that describes the situation of the government's accounts at the end of
the fiscal year and an evaluation of the progress made toward achieving
the budget's policy goals was also not produced for 2016-17.
Deteriorating ranking
In 2006 when the
first edition of the Open Budget Survey was launched, Tanzania was
ranked 25th of the 59 countries surveyed. Tanzania scored 58 percent of
the assessment indicators that year.
The performance has
been volatile and deteriorated to position 102 of 117 countries
surveyed for the 2019 report, with a score of 17 percent against a
global average which was 45 percent.
The country had a better rating in 2017 when its score increased by 10 percent in 2017.
The raise was after
timely publishing the citizen budget online and increasing the
information provided in the Pre-Budget Statement and Enacted Budget.
In the East African
region, Tanzania was ranked 4th in 2019 behind Uganda, Kenya and Rwanda
which had better ranking. It was followed by South Sudan and Burundi.
Globally, New
Zealand (87), South Africa (87), Sweden (86), Mexico (82), Georgia (81)
and Brazil (81) were the top six countries in budget transparency with
their scores for 2019 in brackets.
The countries of
Yemen (0), Venezuela (0), Comoros (0), Qatar (1), Sudan (2) and Algeria
are the least transparent in the budget openness ranking for 2019.
First launched in
2006, the Open Budget Survey is an independent, comparative, and
fact-based research instrument to measure transparency, public
participation in the budget process and oversight done by institutions
such as the legislature and the audit office.
The initiative is
based on the idea that all people in a country should have access to
relevant information on how public resources are raised and spent,
opportunities to contribute to policy decisions that affect their
livelihoods and futures, and assurance of robust budget oversight by
independent well-informed legislatures and audit institutions.
No comments :
Post a Comment