East African economies have sought industrialisation for the
last 50 years. Although there has been some progress, full realisation
of that objective remains elusive. What has been achieved instead is an
efficient services sector across Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania and Rwanda that
by 2018 accounted for 47 per cent of the region’s Gross Domestic
Product.
East Africa is yet to tap
into the huge manufacturing opportunity that would see increased
production of goods for export, increased foreign exchange earnings, and
boost value addition to our agricultural commodities for import
substitution and for export. Manufacturing also presents the opportunity
to create the millions of jobs needed across the region.
Accounting
for about 12 per cent of GDP in 2018, it is considerably below the
average target set by the East African Community partner states of 25
per cent of GDP by 2032. The sector grew at a minimal four per cent
average growth rate between 2015 and 2018. As at 2019, it employed only
three per cent of the active labour force in comparison to agriculture
and trade that accounted for 64 per cent and 13 per cent respectively.
This
is a paradox because governments in the region have expended huge
efforts to promote private sector investments in manufacturing. We have
seen our countries rise through the ranks in the World Bank’s ease of
doing business rankings.
To resolve the paradox, we must fully appreciate the key motivator of private sector growth. It is net profit.
No
private sector player will sustain a failing, loss-making business. A
thriving private sector player scales up their business, as profit
grows, expands their business model into one based on creating shared
value, for example Safaricom.
This is especially so when there is also considerable domestic investment involved.
At
the heart of private sector profit is productivity. If the business is
not optimising its production capacity, then the return on investment is
low.
The current reality is that the
majority of our private sector players are barely hitting their profit
targets, as evidenced by the growing number of profit warnings issued by
listed companies.
Granular analysis
of the private sector ecosystem reveals systemic constraints that
immensely frustrate investors, both domestic and foreign. While these
constraints vary in magnitude from industry to industry, they broadly
fall into the categories of: cost of inputs; labour skills and
productivity; limited access to capital; market penetration; logistics;
graft and industry-specific policies that don’t facilitate efficient
business models.
Our private sector
analysis indicates that increasing and maintaining private sector
investments is not as simple as improving the ease of doing business and
opening our doors to new investors. There must be a deliberate attempt
to break down the industrialisation agenda and resolve challenges after
we land the investor.
We must have
full knowledge and visibility of the business models that will work
especially in the prioritised sectors in our national development plans.
However, to undertake such an analysis and build business models and sector-specific policy regimes is costly.
Our
East African Community governments lack the financial resources and
technical capacity to fully execute such a granular, investor-centric
model needed to achieve industrialisation. This is where having the
right partners in private sector and the development sectors comes in.
However,
our governments are commended for continuing to work with both foreign
and domestic investors in well-coordinated associations such as the
Kenya Association of Manufacturers, the Kenya Private Sector Alliance
and the Uganda Manufacturers Association. These are critical
partnerships.
Equally, a lot more can
be achieved in the region working with development agencies that
consist of bilateral aid, private sector foundations and increasingly,
family philanthropies whose objective is to catalyse job creation
through building private sector competitiveness. With fund sizes valued
at double-digit billions of dollars, these organisations are becoming
more localised as they pursue culturally nuanced development models that
work alongside government and private sector priorities.
When
implemented right, these partnerships can facilitate technical
assistance, provide patient capital and fund innovative solutions needed
to address the systemic constraints the private sector faces in East
Africa.
For example, Safaricom’s
mobile money service, M-Pesa, was the result of a Department for
International Development (UKaid) established Financial Deepening
Challenge Fund that awarded Vodafone a conditional but flexible grant of
nearly £1 million ($1.3 million at current exchange rate) to develop a
product that would leverage mobile phone technology to deliver financial
services in East Africa. Vodafone then went on to partner with
Safaricom on this project and M-Pesa was born.
However,
our governments are not drawing on committed donor funds, which include
grants, despite increasing budget deficits funded through borrowing.
Case
in point is Kenya, where according to the National Treasury, the
country has Sh1.1 trillion ($10 billion) of available but unused donor
funding. This amount is almost twice the current financial year’s fiscal
deficit of Sh657 billion ($6.57 billion).
Unlocking
the full potential of our economies will be a reality only if all these
groups of partners and stakeholders come to the table to collaborate
more effectively.
To do this requires
having an ambitious long-term shared vision that is consistently
implemented to seize the regional (African Continental Free Trade Area)
and global economic opportunities our countries have. Efforts of all
must be better coordinated for this to be achieved.
Diana
Mulili is the interim chief executive officer of Msingi East Africa, a
not-for-profit agency that catalyses industries’ growth.
No comments :
Post a Comment