Sometime in 2011, the US
Treasury Department convened a forum - Access to Capital Conference - to
collate insights from capital market players on how to restore access
to capital for
emerging companies seeking public financing through the Initial Public Offer (IPO) market.
emerging companies seeking public financing through the Initial Public Offer (IPO) market.
This initiative was
happening against a concerning back drop. The US IPO market had been
cooling from a one-year high of 791 IPOs in 1996 to an average of 157
IPO per year during the 2001-2008 period, with a low of 45 in 2008.
More
worryingly, IPOs by smaller companies were showing the steepest
declines. The outcome of the meeting was a report that had four
game-changing recommendations that created additional flexibility for
issuers in the offering process.
Preliminary evidence
shows that since the US Regulation A changes were effected in 2015,
there has been an increase in non-registered offering activity by small
companies.
With more Kenyan Small and Medium
Enterprises (SMEs) constrained of cash but choosing to stay private
longer and deferring their IPOs, perhaps, the Capital Markets Authority
(CMA) might need to borrow a leaf from the US.
That’s not to say, present regulations governing the public
issuance of securities have failed – in fact, it’s possible that they
may have dissuaded many “bad actors” from conning the public.
That being said, the stringent requirements also mean that “good actors” are shut out.
Currently,
private companies have the rule 21 (a) of the CMA Regulations on Public
Offers, Listing and Disclosures (2002) to work with.
Outside
of its bounds (law requires securities not to be offered to more than
one hundred persons, restricted to sophisticated groups and come with a
hard minimum of a Sh100,000 per investor), private firms risk CMA
reporting (even in the absence of a company having conducted a public
offering).
Overall, the investor is the biggest loser as his/her investing options remain limited.
To
follow the US example, CMA could relax triggers for reporting
obligations. In my view, dropping the minimum to Sh10,000 per investor
and increasing the number of investor pool to 300 would be ideal.
Why? Such a proposal would first erase the regulatory burdens on smaller companies and facilitate capital formation.
As an alternative source of capital to a traditional registered IPO, this channel could be most cost effective.
Two, expanding the above provisions “creates” a natural market for a potential future listing.
This
is because these investors would at some point need a liquid market to
trade their shares. Three; not all public issues are necessarily in the
public interest.
To close, it’s important to remember
that further “deregulating” private offers is meant to help the SME
raise capital efficiently.
Implemented well, these
measures hold the prospect of making a difference for SMEs in the
country. Of course, some amount of vetting would be needed to ensure
minimum abuse.
All the same time, expanding the current
provisions means many deserving below-mid market SMEs get to achieve
their funding goals ultimately creating jobs, expanding capital markets
and contributing to the economy.
No comments :
Post a Comment