THE High Court's
Commercial Division has ordered a family owned company that imports and
distributes building materials to pay a debt of 3.6bn/- to ...
Bank of India
(Tanzania) Limited.
Judge Patricia
Fikirini ruled against Fomcom International Limited and its directors,
Furaha Mawamba and Farida Mawamba, the defendants, after granting a
judgment in favour of the Bank, who was the plaintiff in the commercial
dispute.
She pointed out
that all evidence examined together in her view proved that there was an
agreement between the plaintiff and Fomcom Company, where the latter
defendant had obtained credit facilities from the plaintiff bank.
According to her judgment, the agreement was guaranteed and indemnified by the two directors.
She also ruled that
the evidence produced by the plaintiff's Bank proved that Fomcom
Company failed to service his debt loan, which in essence was a breach
of an agreement.
"I find that the
plaintiff has been able to prove his case against (Fomcom International
Limited) and hence judgment in default is entered in that regard.
Likewise the plaintiff has been able to prove the case against the (two
directors)," the judge declared.
She also ruled that
there was abundant evidence that the two directors of Fomcom
International Limited have been obstructing the realization of the
plaintiff's effort to recover the unpaid debt loan.
In that regard the judge found all the defendants jointly and severally liable.
The judge ordered
immediate payment of 3, 674, 245, 170/-25 plus commercial interest at
the rate of seven per cent per annum from September 30, 2017 till date
of this judgment as specified in the Facility Agreement and ordered
payments of 20m/- as general damages.
She further granted
an order to pierce corporate veil of both Furaha Mawamba and Farida
Mawamba to be personally liable to pay the full outstanding amount of
debt, for their illegal acts, and as well being directors and owners of
the company.
Fomcom
International Limited obtained various credit facilities from the
plaintiff with the second and third defendants guaranteeing the
repayment of the money used from the credit facilities plus the accruing
interest and other charges if the 1st defendant will fail to pay back.
On April 16, 2015, while operating under the directorship of the two directors, they obtained line of credit worth 1.6bn/-.
Prior on April 23,
2015, the company through its directors issued a fixed and floating rate
as well as other charges, thereon in favour of the bank as a security
for the provided credit facility.
The credit
facilities were also secured by a mortgage by the company surrendering a
Certificate of Title for a plot located within the Iringa Township in
the name of Fomcom International Limited.
Furthermore, the
two directors created personal guarantee and indemnity agreement that
they shall fully repay on or before its due date and that in case of any
default, they shall be fully personally liable to repay immediately
upon demand the outstanding amount.
On December 17,
2015, the credit facilities limit was revised to be up to 2.6bn/-. A
variation was made to the two debenture deeds to relate to the increased
credit facility.
Each debenture was registered to cover 3,250,000,000/- plus interest and other charges thereon.
As additional
security for additional credit granted, the company created equitable
mortgage by depositing additional residential licenses and by passing a
Board Resolution dated December 17, 2015 accompanied by a letter from
the director of the company bearing the same date.
The two directors
being guarantors of the credit facilities provided to the company, also
made variations of the guarantee and indemnity agreement to cover the
sum of 3,250,000,000/- plus interest and other charges for the credit
facilities, which by then summed up to 2.6bn/-.
It was stated that
despite all these, after obtaining the credit facilities from the
plaintiff, the defendants refused and, or failed to repay the loan in
accordance with the agreed terms and conditions of the loans.
No comments :
Post a Comment