A section of Uhuru Highway in Nairobi. PHOTO | DENNIS ONSONGO
There are two planned highway projects that answer to the
definition of expressways. There is the
Nairobi city expressway (dubbed “upstairs” project) running from Mlolongo to the ABC exchange on Waiyaki Way, and there is the Mombasa/Nairobi expressway. Both are modelled on PPP (Private-Public-Partnership) funding by Chinese and American investors respectively, with toll payments by users. The two projects have attracted public debate with varying views.
Nairobi city expressway (dubbed “upstairs” project) running from Mlolongo to the ABC exchange on Waiyaki Way, and there is the Mombasa/Nairobi expressway. Both are modelled on PPP (Private-Public-Partnership) funding by Chinese and American investors respectively, with toll payments by users. The two projects have attracted public debate with varying views.
The
socio-economic justification for upgrading the city traffic artery
through Uhuru Highway has never been in question and is mainly justified
by time-cost of persons, vehicle and goods stranded in traffic
snarl-ups. There is also the foreign exchange wasted as imported fuel is
wastefully burned by idling vehicles, and incremental carbon dioxide
and particulate emissions which impact the environment. There is also
reputational cost to the country when fly-in visitors are stranded for
hours in traffic gridlocks.
Planned dedication of a
lane on the expressway to BRT (Bus Rapid Transport) will be a major
value addition to the ongoing city traffic decongestion programme. Two
by-passes (Eastern and Southern) together with other link-roads have
already diverted significant traffic volumes away from Uhuru Highway.
The “upstairs” expressway will hopefully provide the final solution, and
this is why we need to give it a chance.
It is not the
justifications for the city expressway that the public are debating,
but the affordability of the project at a time when the country is
heavily in debt. By opting for the PPP funding model, the government
essentially transfers the project funding burden and responsibility to
the motorists who will pay tolls (indirect “road taxes”) for its use.
After 20 years, the infrastructure will revert from the private investor to the government.
Essentially it will be the tolls that will provide cash flows
for the entire project costs which include capital and operating costs, a
return for the investor and allowances to hedge against perceived
economic and political country risks. It is the quantum of chargeable
toll that will determine the expressway eventual popularity with the
motorists.
And the devil is of course in the detail and
caveats of the PPP contract and this being a single- sourced project,
and with little public information available, surprises on toll
quantification cannot be entirely ruled out. We should never have to
compel motorists to use the tolled upstairs project when they have the
option to use the un-tolled downstairs highway. The toll amount should
be right to sustain use and funding of the PPP project.
The
socio-environmental concerns associated with the project appear to have
been addressed especially in respect of interference with the parks. It
is also hoped that the project will not significantly interfere with
the three religious sites (Lutheran, St Paul, and Pope Francis shrine)
along Uhuru Highway.
By contrast, the planned
Mombasa-to-Nairobi expressway which will be single-sourced from American
private investors beats all manner of economic logic and justification.
It does not make much sense to create new road competition for the SGR
which is still struggling for cargo volume and fighting off competition
from road transporters on the existing highway, which is still a good
road undergoing upgrade. We have many contradictions here.
If
Kenya has to help the US to make an entry into African infrastructure
arena and effectively compete with the Chinese, better PPP projects can
be made available to the US for consideration. The Mombasa/Nairobi
expressway as currently conceived does not appear to measure up to
economic expectations of today.
I will now shift the
subject to the new ABC-Red Hill link road which has dramatically altered
the traffic dynamics with significant reduction of travel time to the
UN headquarters. However as with other successful by-passes and
link-roads, a huge pile-up of traffic has been created at the Red Hill
and Limuru Road junction. The authorities will need to debottleneck this
section to maintain the gains made by the link road.
My
final appeal is to the Cabinet Secretary for Transportation to
facilitate Thika superhighway to be named after retired President
Kibaki, a deserving request which does not require much justification.
No comments :
Post a Comment