Kenya and Djibouti took their bruising battle for the United
Nations Security Council non-permanent seat to New York, with each
country’s diplomats trying to outdo the other in lobbying for votes.
Djibouti,
which lost to Kenya in the election for the African Union
representative for the UNSC seat, played up Nairobi’s current boundary
dispute with Somalia as an indicator that the country could not be
trusted to handle regional security matters.
Kenya,
however, flaunted its credentials as a pillar of peace in a troubled
region, citing in particular its role in assisting millions of Somali
and South Sudanese refugees, and ultimately helping the two to form
their own governments.
At least 90
heads of state and representatives of other countries attended the
United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) last week, bringing 196
delegations to the annual, multilateral pilgrimage to New York.
BATTLE
Kenyan
diplomats distributed pennants and lapel badges labelled “African Union
endorsed candidate” for the seat, whose election for the term 2021-2022
is due next year.
Djibouti, on the other hand, dished out
posters avoiding reference to the African Union, but still indicating
its candidacy for the very seat.
Egyptian
President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi’s efforts to convene a meeting between
President Uhuru Kenyatta and Djibouti’s Ismail Omar Guelleh on the
margins of the UN General Assembly failed to produce a solution.
Instead,
President el-Sisi, also chairman of the African Union, was told after
the “dialogue” that Djibouti would remain in the race.
On
August 22, Egyptian Permanent Representative to the African Union,
Osama Abdel Khalek, chaired a session in which the Permanent
Representatives Committee voted for Kenya 37-13 in a secret ballot,
meaning Nairobi had attained the required two-thirds majority to vie for
the UNSC seat as the AU endorsed candidate.
Both
Nairobi and Djibouti are members of the Intergovernmental Authority on
Development (IGAD) and contributors to the African Union Mission in
Somalia, but they are taking divergent routes to secure the prestigious
seat.
However, efforts to promote
regional peace and stability appear to be the common theme in pitches by
both countries. Ahead of the UNGA meeting, Nairobi’s diplomats said
they would take part in the UN agenda, then seek to “take on detractors
who wish to malign” Kenya’s endorsement from the African Union.
LOBBYING
The
African Union, which has no vote at the UN, traditionally agrees to
endorse member states “to act in its name” at the UN Security Council.
But, Djibouti thinks otherwise. At its recent launch for its
candidature, Djibouti’s Foreign Minister Mohamud Yussuf Ali threw an
indirect jab at Kenya, claiming only his country was capable of helping
stabilise Somalia.
Speaking to an
audience of diplomats in Djibouti, he argued that Kenya’s maritime
boundary dispute with Somalia could see it use the position to exert
undue pressure on Mogadishu, and hence destabilise the country even
more.
“If elected, Djibouti will
relentlessly promote the obligation of all states to uphold
international law in the maintenance of peace and security, and advocate
for recommitment to a multilateral, rule-based international order,”
said Djibouti President Guelleh in his address to UNGA in New York.
Nairobi
has avoided talking about the maritime dispute with Somalia in its
campaign messaging, insisting however that the row should be resolved
through negotiations. The case is currently before the International
Court of Justice.
President Kenyatta,
who met about two dozen world leaders on the margins of the UNGA, said
Kenya was seeking the seat to continue contributing to regional peace.
“When
the world turned away from Somalia, we engaged and invested in the
Eldoret and Mbagathi peace processes, which led to the formation and
hosting of the Transitional National Government in Kenya, and
(relocation) of the Transitional Federal Government to Somalia,” said
President Kenyatta, adding, “We, therefore, hope that our experience,
competencies and unrelenting search for peace and prosperity in our
neighbourhood, on the continent and the wider world, will persuade the
entire UN Membership to support the African Union candidate for the
non-permanent seat of the United Nations Security Council during the
elections slated for June 2020.”
Nairobi
also listed its sending of more than 40,000 peacekeepers so far to
various UN missions as an indication of its suitability to hold the
seat.
The battle is to get at least
129 votes at the UN when the election is held next June. President
Kenyatta asked for votes from “each and every member of the UN family.”
HEATED RACE
Djibouti, however, believes that it is the right candidate for the seat.
Mohamed
Siad Doualeh, Djibouti’s Permanent Representative to the UN, claimed
Kenya’s election victory at the AU was irregular, even though Djibouti
took part in the polls twice and conceded defeat.
“The
process through which Kenya obtained the endorsement of its candidature
is wholly illegitimate. As yet, there has been no decision by the AU
Executive Council or the Summit, which in any case, is not bound by the
vote of the Permanent Representatives Committee,” he argued referring to
the council of foreign ministers and the summit of heads of state.
The
position, however, is that Egypt, which chaired the session, already
wrote to the Council validating Kenya’s endorsement, after Djibouti
initially conceded defeat.
For
Djibouti though, the AU’s traditional rotation policy where available
positions are circulated based on regional balance as well as the
previous number of times a country has served, should have been the
better criteria.
Since the UNSC slot
fell on the eastern Africa region, Djibouti had argued it should have
been given priority because Kenya has been there twice in 1973-1974 and
in 1997-1998. Djibouti served in 1993-1994.
“Behind
the African Union’s secret magic formula for endorsement and clean
slate lies the constant effort to build consensus, mutual accommodation
and respect for the sacred principle of rotation,” the Djiboutian envoy
argued in a series of Tweets.
Consensus,
however, is only one of many ways the AU makes decisions. According to
the Rules of Procedure, substantive matters can be put to a vote (where
the winner must garner two thirds majority) if consensus fails. In fact,
the vote had to be repeated after the first on August 5, failed to
produce a clear, two-thirds majority winner.
Kenya
and Djibouti’s heated race is not entirely new though. In 1960, a race
for Europe’s representative went for more than 50 rounds between Poland
and Turkey, producing no clear winner. They later agreed to share out
their two-year term.
The Netherlands and Italy also failed to agree in 2016, so they shared the seat.
No comments :
Post a Comment