East Africa's capital markets scored highly on market
transparency, tax and regulatory environment and access to foreign
currency according to the Absa Africa Financial Markets Index for 2018,
but fared badly on local investor capacity.
This
finding on Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania and Rwanda reflects several
weaknesses faced by domestic investors that carry out financial trades
with foreign peers.
The Absa Africa Financial Markets
Index was launched last year by Absa Group Ltd of South Africa, a large
banking institution that recently acquired most of Barclays Bank Plc
Africa’s operations.
It offers clues on policy reforms needed to raise competitiveness. The index currently tracks 20 African economies.
The
2018 index shows Rwanda scored 90 points in the area of market
transparency, tax and regulatory environment followed by Tanzania and
Kenya at 70 points each, and Uganda with 60 points.
The
relatively high scores reflect benefits realised from past financial
reforms tied to disclosure requirements for listed securities, smooth
tax rules for capital markets players and harmonised regulations.
In comparison, Kenya scored 93 points for access to foreign
exchange services and came top of the survey list, with South Africa in
second place at 91 points. Uganda scored 83 points in this area,
followed by Tanzania and Rwanda with 36 and 35 points respectively.
Key
assessment indicators include ease of access to foreign currency,
pricing habits and turnover levels recorded in the interbank forex
markets.
Kenya’s interbank forex market turnover was
valued at $34 billion in 2017, compared with $1.2 trillion posted by
South Africa, and Uganda’s $17 billion.
In market
depth, Kenya scored 44 points while Uganda scored 43 points. Tanzania
scored 35 points and Rwanda 21 points. The fairly poor showing was
blamed on low product variety in local equities and debt markets.
The
stockmarkets remain dominated by financial institutions, beverage
companies and telecommunications firms as well as small baskets of
government securities.
Insufficient capacity among
local investors driven by inability to execute frequent, large financial
trades with foreign peers; low demand for sophisticated products like
derivatives and weaknesses detected in anti-money laundering and
financing of terrorism compliance standard, also reflected negatively on
the calibre of domestic institutional investors.
No comments :
Post a Comment