Sacked Kenya Re managing director Jadiah Mwarania. FILE PHOTO | NMG
Sacked Kenya Re managing director Jadiah
Mwarania’s tribulations were caused by his efforts to comply with State
House orders requiring him to initiate the replacement of board chairman
David Kemei and two other directors, the Employment and Labour
Relations Court has found.
Justice Byram Ongaya in a
Friday ruling observed that Mr Mwarania, who worked for Kenya Re for 27
years, had a clean record of performance until a letter by Public
Service head Joseph Kinyua reached his office.
Mr
Kinyua, in a confidential letter dated June 8, 2017, directed Mr
Mwarania to list Michael Monari, Hilda Muchunku and Julius Koros for a
board members election during the company's annual general meeting. They
were to replace Mr Kemei, a Mr Mukoma and Shakaba.
“In
that consideration, the court returns as credible the claimant’s
account that his acting upon that letter, as was his duty, was the
proximate causation in the chain of the subsequent events culminating in
his termination,” observed the judge.
The Judge ordered the reinstatement of Mr Mwarania and directed
full payment for the period he was away and directed that the board
should not interfere. He noted it would be unfair for Mr Mwarania to
suffer loss of his "hard earned professional reputation and employment
in circumstances that are linked to his actions in discharge of official
duties".
Mr
Mwarania had recounted that for the 27 years, he received his first
warning memo in June 2017, shortly after he complied with orders from Mr
Kinyua.
But Mr Kemei denied knowledge of Mr Kinyua’s
directive, holding that the firm’s performance in the past three years
had deteriorated, forcing the board to intervene.
Contrary
to the claim by the board, the firm has returned profits in the period
Mr Mwarania has been at the helm, the judge ruled. The court ruled the
MD's termination was unfair as he was not given an opportunity to be
heard. The court ruled the alternative remedy is award of Sh22.3 million
being his gross salary for one year.
The Judge said
awarding such amount to a person willing to go back to his job is
oppressive and punitive since the firm is a State corporation.
No comments :
Post a Comment