The rising levels of non-performing loans threatens loans availability in sub-Saharan Africa. File photo | nmg
Rising credit risks in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), which began in
2015, is now threatening to slow down loans availability in the region.
At the close of 2015, only about eight per cent of commercial banks’
outstanding loans in SSA were classified as non-performing, on average
terms.
The figure then marginally climbed to 10 per
cent in 2016. However by the close of 2017, it had steeply jumped to
about 13 per cent, all on average terms. This steep upward glide has
been driven by three of the region’s banking sector heavyweights, namely
Nigeria, Angola and Ghana. Indeed, in the three countries alone, 23 per
cent of banking sector outstanding loans were classified as
non-performing by the close of 2017, up from 17 per cent at the close of
2015.
In Nigeria and Angola, the region’s biggest
crude oil producers, the surge in loan non-performance is closely linked
to the plunge in global oil prices that begun in mid-2014, as the fall
in proceeds from oil sales suddenly couldn’t accommodate servicing of
reserved-based loans that had been advanced when global oil prices
hovered in excess of $100 per barrel.
The problem was
also exacerbated by the fact that oil and gas sector accounted for the
largest share of bank loans—especially in Nigeria. Apart from direct
lending, the plunge also triggered decimation of oil and gas related
supply chain. In Ghana, which began crude production not so long ago and
is largely an outlier among the three, it has been a unique case of
unpaid energy sector subsidies (by the government) and tenuous lending
activities. Broadly, there are two identifiable causes of the rise in
credit risks.
First is the synchronised slowdown in global output, which
sucked in sub-Saharan Africa; and was exacerbated by the fall in
commodity prices. Second, at the micro-level, tenuous lending practices
exposed a number of balance sheets to macro downturns.
Resultantly,
this elevation in credit risks has taken a bite out of credit growth in
the region. Indeed, latest data from the International Monetary Fund
(IMF) shows that annual private sector credit growth in SSA plunged to
3.3 per cent in 2017, from 12.5 per cent in 2016.
It
was a synchronised plunge which could be felt both at home and within
the vicinity. In Kenya, annual loan book growth came in at just four per
cent. However, Kenya’s case remains unique due to its interest rate
control law. In Tanzania, annual private sector credit growth plunged to
its lowest of just under two per cent in 2017 despite the country’s
regulator Bank of Tanzania amplifying liquidity in the system. In
Uganda, 2017 annual private sector credit growth came in at just six per
cent. The outlook for credit growth in 2018 isn’t rosy either.
However,
not all countries in SSA recorded sustained deterioration in loan
performance. There are a group of nations, which recorded a decline or
stability, and they include such notable names as South Africa,
Ethiopia, Uganda, Zimbabwe and the eight-member West African monetary
and economic union, often referred to by its French acronym of UEMOA
(Union Economique et Monétaire Ouest Africaine).
Some
of them have incredible success stories. For Uganda, the stability has
been brought by the regulatory seizure of Crane Bank back in October
2016, as the bank accounted for half of the sector’s non-performing
loans.
In Zimbabwe, authorities had to set up a
bad-bank vehicle to purchase eligible bad loans from financial
institutions on commercial terms. That move narrowed non-performance to
just seven per cent at the close of 2017. However, this basket of
countries notwithstanding, the pendulum of risks, in as far as credit
risks are concerned, still swings on the upside.
george.bodo@gmail.com
No comments :
Post a Comment