
Health Principal Secretary Julius Korir. FILE PHOTO | NATION MEDIA GROUP
A company which was contracted to supply
anti-malaria equipment and drugs wants Health Principal Secretary Julius
Korir cited for contempt of court.
This
follows the government’s failure to clear a debt of more than Sh43
billion. The company wants the PS committed to civil jail for six
months.
Equip Agencies Ltd sued the
PS and the Attorney-General following a protracted legal battle over
Sh43 billion which it was to be paid after supplying the equipment in
1993 and 1995.
ROW
The
Health ministry was at first required to pay the firm Sh1.9 billion.
However, the amount has gone up after attracting interest.
There
have also been at least three court judgments over the row. In all of
them, courts have ruled in the company’s favour, but the ministry has
not acted since 1999 when the matter first landed in court.
Through
lawyer Waweru Gatonye, the company accused the ministry of refusing to
clear the debt as ordered in the first judgment which was upheld in a
2011 as well as a 2017 case.
“The
court should issue summons against the Health PS to appear before it and
show cause why contempt of court proceedings should not be instituted
against him for failure to comply with orders issued on December 18,
2017 by Justice Roselyn Aburili,” said Mr Gatonye, adding that the court
needs to act urgently.
DECISION
The
first judgment was issued on March 1, 1999, the second one on December
2, 2011 while the latest decision was the one made by Justice Aburili
last year.
According to Mr Gatonye, the decisions have never been appealed by the government yet the money has never been paid as required.
The money was supposed to be paid to the firm in separate tranches after delivering the equipment.
But
the non-payment has been attributed to a letter to the company from the
office of the PS indicating that the ministry had suspended supplies
from Equip Agencies.
In the letter,
the ministry had alleged that it required time for stock take and review
funding for the programme. In the judgments, the judges have pointed
out that there have never been a dispute over the supplied goods or
questions raised with regard to quality or standard of the specified
items.
No comments :
Post a Comment