Rwandan dancers. Over the past century, Rwandans have crossed the border and settled in central Uganda. FILE PHOTO | NMG
Banyarwanda could be Uganda’s biggest tribe and we better learn to live with it.
There
is enough circumstantial evidence for this which I have been
encountering in recent years. As a
man grows older and older, he tends to attend more burials every month than before.
man grows older and older, he tends to attend more burials every month than before.
It is
at burials where people with flat noses like mine get introduced to
sharp nosed relatives and as the relationship is explained, you find
that you share a grandparent only one or two generations ago. I recently
even met some Banyarwanda nieces and nephews!
Uganda’s
constitution lists Banyarwanda as one of the country’s ethnic
communities, which at the time of promulgation set people arguing
whether Banyarwanda are the country’s sixth or seventh largest tribe. I
think that is unnecessary.
Banyarwanda are omnipresent
and could be Uganda’s largest tribe as Kinyarwanda blood probably runs
in most Ugandans’ veins and whoever thinks it is an issue just needs to
commission a scientific study, as matters of tribes cannot just be
settled by verbal arguments.
A study done at
Independence in 1962 found that a fifth (20 per cent) of people in Buddu
county (now called Greater Masaka area) of Buganda kingdom were ethnic
Banyarwanda. It can be assumed that today, it is a fifth of Buddu people
who don’t have Rwandan blood.
For some reason, people who have been coming from Rwanda to
Uganda over the past century or so, found it easier to integrate in
central Uganda than in their more neighbouring western Uganda.
It
is at burials that many of us get to realise how much of rural central
Uganda is settled by Banyarwanda. Trying to find out who has no Rwanda
blood in Buganda is a purposeless waste of time; even the firstborn son
of the Kabaka is born of a Munyarwanda woman, a prominent one at that.
The Big men quarrel
In
October of 1978, Idi Amin attacked Tanzania and annexed the northern
province of Kagera, even appointing a district commissioner for
“Uganda’s new district of Kagera”. It was a wrong target, as the
response led to his overthrow six months later.
Maybe
if Amin had instead attacked and annexed Rwanda then, he could have been
more successful and the inhabitants of the two countries would simply
have gone ahead to live together. Amin would most certainly have taken
one or two Banyarwanda brides and life would continue till another
change came.
Currently, the top leaders of Uganda and
Rwanda are having what those in the know say is their worst conflict
ever, “worse than Kisangani” when our two armies fought in June 2000,
leaving a scary number of Ugandan soldiers wiped out in one battle.
But
whatever the big men are quarrelling about, we ordinary Ugandans and
Rwandans don’t even want to know. We are grateful that it has not
affected the business and social interaction of people and only pray for
the big men to resolve their things sooner than later.
For
several months now, whispers of bad blood between Kampala and Kigali
have been growing loud, louder and then quiet, as life on the outside
has remained normal all along.
Talk of the conflict
has been revived with the recent arrest of Ugandan police officers by
the Ugandan military and arraigning them before the court martial on
charges that include abducting Rwandan nationals and returning them to
the country they fled from, a sin called refoulement in international
law.
Now top opposition leader Dr Kizza Besigye has
gone on record to say that recent changes of command in the Uganda
Police Force had a lot to do with the Kampala-Kigali stand-off.
Besigye
himself was in 2001 accused of being too cosy with Rwanda which had
been categorised as a hostile foreign power, a status we didn’t even
accord to Khartoum which sponsored warlord Joseph Kony for two decades,
and whose Kampala embassy we raided and captured a couple of rusty guns.
So Dr Besigye, who usually keeps a step ahead of
state intelligence when doing his things, must be knowing what he is
talking about.
When he says our two countries have been intricately linked for decades, I guess we just have to accept it.
Success
Dr
Besigye compared Uganda and Rwanda to those old-fashioned posters you
used to find in shops showing two men, one happily satisfied saying: “I
sold on cash” and the other miserably emaciated saying: “I sold on
credit.”
Besigye said the emaciated man represents
Uganda while the happy guy is Rwanda, which was a different case in the
not too distant past.
For Uganda was ahead of Rwanda
almost in all indicators of development until the Banyarwanda who had
played a dominant role in Uganda’s five-year bush war that brought the
NRM to power went back and took power in Kigali after a four-year war,
to start re-directing the affairs of their original country.
This observation is very important to fathom what has been happening to the human relations between Ugandans and Rwandans.
Before
the re-building of Rwanda started in the 1990s and for a while after,
Ugandans looked down upon Banyarwanda including, among other things,
calling them dirty. They accused them of spitting everywhere and so on.
Today, Rwandans are obsessed with cleanliness while an average Ugandan is happy to live in filth.
Today, Ugandans have openly given up on/in to corruption while Rwandans fight it.
But
of course Ugandans feel freer as we make merry in our stinking,
disorderly capital of Kampala where nobody seems to be in charge. To
date, there is no control of boda boda, the dominant means of transport
in Kampala that kills seven people daily in the country.
In
short, Rwanda has turned out to be the child who was despised in the
family but worked diligently to become more successful than the favoured
kids who turned into drunks.
However, the children,
both the disciplined and the drunkos, continue to love one another and
remain “tight” even as the parents bicker.
But to
their credit, the parents are not stopping the children from
interacting. They are probably aware that the children will outlive
them, and it is not wise to poison their relations, and it is better to
allow them to remain united as they take on strong future competition
from other families.
Because in this case, the
favoured children have the natural resources while the unfavoured ones
are disciplined and are acquiring skills, a combination the two
categories will need to take on the world.
No comments :
Post a Comment