Opportunities are domiciled in “productive” sectors such as agriculture, livestock, forestry, and mining. FILE photo | nmg
Summary
- A good number of devolved units have sectors that are crying for value addition.
- I strongly believe that the urgency and priority for Kenya is indeed in the many value-adding and jobs-multiplying manufacturing opportunities based on local resource inputs.
- And these opportunities are domiciled in the “productive” sectors such as agriculture, livestock, forestry, and mining which are in rural counties.
Developing new industries is an effort with long lead-times.
Historically we have not produced remarkable results in manufacturing
because policies, strategies and efforts have not been correctly
aligned.
Moreover, we appear to spend too much time
enunciating challenges besetting manufacturing— cost of doing business,
cost of energy, non-tariff barriers, cheap imports etc— instead of
emphasizing practical realizable opportunities and quick-wins. Further
we have not creatively segmented manufacturing sector for optimal
national benefits.
We tend to focus on the elusive
high-tech manufacturing and equipment assembling segments by foreign
investors which, although they are rich on technology transfer, may be
using more imported than locally produced inputs.
These may not also be strong on job numbers and net foreign exchange balance.
We need to define and prioritise our target niche manufacturing
segments. And I strongly believe that the urgency and priority for Kenya
is indeed in the many value-adding and jobs-multiplying manufacturing
opportunities based on local resource inputs.
And
these opportunities are domiciled in the “productive” sectors such as
agriculture, livestock, forestry, and mining which are in rural
counties. The industrialisation officials should therefore be seen to be
out there working hand in hand with ministries responsible for these
sectors, and also with county officials.
Let us analyse
this agro-manufacturing case study from Nyandarua County. A few weeks
ago the county stated that they will grow surplus Irish potatoes to
manufacture “starch” and animal feed by-products. This is an
agricultural value chain with a huge potential for jobs not only in this
county but other similar potato growing areas.
Indeed,
Eldoret had a similar factory which used maize to make starch, syrup,
yeast, and animal feed by-products. It supplied breweries and
pharmaceutical industries with starch, and syrup to confectionery
factories. The factory closed down in early 2000, probably because of
challenges listed above.
Other obvious starch crops in
Kenya are bananas, cassava and sorghum, and these are equally
candidates for food security synergy.
Another
excellent industrialisation case study is the bamboo plantation
enterprise in the semi-arid areas of Tharaka-Nithi County. I understand a
factory is planned to manufacture paper, pulp, textiles, energy
products, and wood-related products from bamboo. This is a high job
content forestry project that also increases forest cover, another
pressing national environmental issue.
How can the
industrialisation officials together with their counterparts in the
agriculture and forestry departments support the establishment and
expansion of the two county projects to achieve maximum and sustainable
potential, and replicate similar efforts in other parts of Kenya?
On
the minimum, assistance is needed for technical and marketing
feasibility, sourcing of investment capital and up-scaling the projects
to achieve economies of scale. The ministry should then work on
regulatory and where necessary fiscal facilitation for quick and
sustainable results.
The
two case studies are just a few of many rural based value adding
manufacturing opportunities which require feasibility studies which can
be summarised in investor promotion pamphlets. This would be a more
proactive investment conferencing approach than merely discussing
Kenya’s investment climate.
As a start, it would help
to organise a brainstorming rural-based industrialisation forum,
co-sponsored by the departments of industrialisation, agriculture,
forestry and mining, and county governments, to outline a co-ordinated
and prioritised effort to drive value-adding manufacturing across Kenya.
This is essentially an inter-ministerial effort,
which calls for the Cabinet to decide how best to coordinate and monitor
progress. And this sounds like a candidate for the Presidential
Delivery Unit stewardship for objectivity and independence.
Local
manufacturing, international trade, and diplomatic relationships are
becoming very inter-related, and I believe our top leadership is working
very hard in this area to maximise value for Kenya.
There
is also the newly signed Africa trade pact that could spur more
opportunities for our manufacturing sector. We also need to closely
watch the new US-China trade wars just in case there are new
opportunities for our manufacturing and trade.
No comments :
Post a Comment