Workers at the Mabati Rolling Mills one stop centre. file photo | nmg
Summary
- Mabati Rolling Mills Limited has sued its rival Royal Mabati Factory Limited claiming infringement of the trademark for its Versatile brand leading to confusion in the market.
- Mabati Rolling Mills claims that the rival firm, which also manufactures and distributes roofing products, has branded its products ‘Versatile’, a name Mabati Rolling Mills says it has reserved for exclusive use.
- Royal Mabati has dismissed Mabati Rolling Mills’ attempt to seek exclusive use of the term as too ambitious.
Two iron sheet manufacturers have opened a vicious court battle
over the ownership of a popular trade name in the roofing products
market.
Mabati Rolling Mills Limited has sued its rival
Royal Mabati Factory Limited claiming infringement of the trademark for
its Versatile brand leading to confusion in the market.
Mabati
Rolling Mills, which is associated with billionaire Manu Chandaria,
claims that the rival firm, which also manufactures and distributes
roofing products, has branded its products ‘Versatile’, a name Mabati
Rolling Mills says it has reserved for exclusive use.
Royal
Mabati, which has registered its roofing product as Royal Versatile,
has dismissed the allegations, arguing that Mabati Rolling Mills is
merely feeling the heat from new market entrants.
Mabati Rolling Mills is seeking a permanent injunction restraining Royal Mabati from using the trade name.
“We
are seeking a permanent injunction blocking the defendant, whether by
its directors, officers, servants or agents, licensees, franchisees or
any of them or otherwise from packaging, distributing, advertising,
marketing and/or in any way availing to the public its products known as
‘Bricktile’ by use of the descriptive word ‘Versatile’”, Mabati Rolling
Mills says in a petition before court.
The company
further wants the High Court to have Royal Mabati surrender all roofing
tiles and iron sheets branded ‘Versatile’ for destruction. Mabati
Rolling Mills claims that it has three brands of roofing materials with
the brand name Versatile.
These are Versatile
registered in 2004 and 2005, which are colour-coated tile profile iron
sheets and Royal Versatile registered in 2013, which is coloured
Aluminum-Zinc-coated tile profiled iron sheets.
Mabati
Rolling Mills says it has spent Sh586 million since 2006 in marketing
and promoting the Versatile brand, and accuses its rival of seeking to
benefit from its effort through imitation.
Mabati
Rolling Mills argues Royal Mabati’s use of its trade name has caused
confusion in the market, leading to consumers purchasing the Royal
Mabati roofing material in the belief that it belongs to Mabati Rolling
Mills. Royal Mabati registered its trade mark Royal Versatile in 2015
with the Registrar of Trade Marks.
Registration was
granted after the application was published in Industrial Property
journal and 60 days lapsed with no complaints raised. Mabati Rolling
Mills claims that the trade mark was registered six months after the
firm was incorporated in 2015.
Mabati Rolliing Mills
last year filed a complaint with the Registrar of Trade Marks seeking to
strike out the registration. The matter is before the High Court for a
final decision.
Royal Mabati has, however, denied the
allegations and accused Mabati Rolling Mills of feeling uncomfortable
with new market entrants who are producing quality products at
competitive prices.
Royal
Mabati argues that Mabati Rolling Mills has no trade mark called
Versatile or Royal Versatile since the word is incapable of registration
as the exclusive property of any party because it lacks
distinctiveness.
“The word versatile is a laudatory
term, which has its foundation in the English Language and so it cannot
be protected as trademark,” Royal Mabati says, adding that the word is
used in the roofing products industry to refer to the quality,
durability and integrity of the roofing tiles.
Royal Mabati has therefore dismissed Mabati Rolling Mills’ attempt to seek exclusive use of the term as too ambitious.
It
has accused Mabati Rolling Mills of stalking, spying on and tracking
its delivery tracks and of running aggressive smear campaigns on social
media aimed at damaging the reputation of its business.
No comments :
Post a Comment