Summary
- Justice John Mativo ruled that the case raises substantial issues of law and the constitution.
- He ruled that the file be forwarded to Chief Justice David Maraga to constitute a bench of an uneven number of judges to hear and determine the case.
- On Tuesday, the AG filed an application seeking the matter be heard by a three-judge only to seek withdrawal of the application today.
Justice John Mativo ruled that the case raises substantial issues of law and the constitution.
He
ruled that the file be forwarded to Chief Justice David Maraga to
constitute a bench of an uneven number of judges to hear and determine
the case.
Weighty matter
He ruled that
although a judge of High Court under article 165(4) of the constitution
can hear any constitutional issues, the matter raises weighty
constitutional issues presumably deserved to be heard by judges.
On
Tuesday, the AG filed an application seeking the matter be heard by a
three-judge only to seek withdrawal of the application today.
However, the judge allowed parties to argue on the case paving way for the ruling he made.
No comments :
Post a Comment