Justices Sauda Mjasiri, Batuel Mmilla
and Shaban Lila ordered fresh hearing of the matter after noting
irregularities in the earlier trial, notably, failure by the High Court
to give Mgimwa a chance to be assessed of his mental condition,
following his commitment to a mental institution for observation.
They noted that though Mgimwa, the
appellant, had legal representation, the issue was not raised by his
advocate, but it was the duty of the trial court to ensure that the
accused person’s mental status at the time he was alleged to have
committed the offence is established, if that question became relevant.
“In the instant case, the court had
already made an order for the appellant to be committed in a mental
institution for observation. The High Court record is silent as to what
actually transpired,” the justices further observed.
According to the justices, it was
evident from the record that after the appellant was committed to mental
hospital, the medical report was not admitted in court and no reference
was made of it during the trial. They said that there was
non-compliance of section 220 (1) (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act.
“The proceedings and judgment of the
High Court were therefore a nullity. By powers vested in us under
section 4 (2) of the (Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, we hereby quash the
proceedings and judgment and set aside the death sentence. We make an
order for a retrial as soon as practicable,” they declared.
On the day of the incident, the
appellant attacked his mother with a big bamboo stick. He chased her
around and gave her a thorough thrashing, causing her death. The
deceased called out for help and two neighbours responded.
However, they could not stop the
appellant. He chased them away, threatening to hit them with the bamboo
stick. The appellant then continued to hit the deceased even after she
fell down and became unconscious. The appellant was successfully
arrested and charged with murder.
No evidence was adduced as to why the
appellant attacked the deceased. Before commencement of the trial,
advocate Rwezaula Kaijage, for the appellant, informed the court that
after communicating with his client and looking at the statements of
witnesses, he felt that there was a possibility that he was insane at
the time he committed the offence.
He prayed for the appellant to be sent
to a mental institution, Isanga Institution in Dodoma, for observation
and determination of his mental status. There being no objection from
the prosecution, the High Court ordered the appellant to be detained in a
mental hospital for medical examination.
No comments :
Post a Comment