Sunday, December 31, 2017

Did threats of impeachment force Kadaga to bend rules during debate?

Uganda's Speaker Rebecca Kadaga receives President Yoweri Museveni at Serena Hotel. PHOTO | NMG
Uganda's Speaker Rebecca Kadaga receives President Yoweri Museveni at Serena Hotel. PHOTO | NMG 
By HALIMA ABDALLAH
More by this Author
Speaker of Uganda’s parliament Rebecca Kadaga has come under heavy criticism in the wake of the falling out from the passage of the age limit Bill, which allows President Yoweri Museveni to be a candidate in the next general election.
Critics say she found herself between a rock and a hard place by the ruling National Resistance Movement that supported her for the seat while opposition legislators accuse her of breaching the standing orders of the House during debate on the Bill.
“The Speaker was threatened with removal from the office because they said that she cannot be a speaker from NRM who cannot do the things NRM wants. There were silent moves to pass a vote of no confidence, but now she remains hanging on,” said Opposition Chief Whip Semujju Ibrahim Nganda.
A senior member of NRM Mike Mukula, who is the party’s vice chairman for Eastern Uganda, however, denied that the party intimidated the speaker over the Bill.
“The Speaker cannot undermine her integrity and that of parliament. I have seen her stand her ground even in the middle of stern pressure. We know she was in the middle of pressure from both the pro and anti-age limit removal sides,” Capt Mukula said.
Parliament also defended Ms Kadaga, saying she handled the debate in line with rules and dismisses claims of her job being put on the line as “simple politicking.”
“The same rules they quote give authority to the speaker and her ruling is final, but challengeable. What is clear is that the speaker did everything as provided for by the rules of procedure,” he said.
Succession debate
Analysts, however, see the scrutiny the speaker has been put under as part of the intrigues surrounding the succession question within NRM and the country. Since she became speaker in 2016, Ms Kadaga has won friends across the political divide for her non-partisan handling of parliamentary business.
Ms Kadaga has also built a formidable constituency within parliament including opposition MPs, a network that affords her access to any part of the country through the legislators. Outside parliament, as NRM vice chairperson, Ms Kadaga has been the chief guest at many public and private events.
Ms Kadaga, a lawyer, has held several positions in the government over the past three decades, serving twice as a deputy and as a speaker. Her defence of citizen rights has on occasion put her on a collision course with the executive and the judiciary.
Source said her profile has not gone well with a section of the top party leadership and there have been attempts to undermine her. They said the age limit Bill offered the party an opportunity to kill several birds with one stone: Cast the speaker differently in the eyes of the public and the opposition and clear the path for President Museveni, effectively leaving him in control of the NRM succession.
Proponents of the conspiracy theory point to the fact that Ms Kadaga had eschewed confrontation with the executive and the party on passage of controversial legislation by opting to have her deputy Jacob Oulanyah preside during such sittings.
They even talk of a meeting with party bigwigs on September 21, the last of several, where it was decided that she would preside during the debate on the Constitutional Amendment 2017 Bill — commonly referred to as the Magyezi Bill after sponsor Raphael Magyezi.
The Bill seeks to amend Article 102 (b) of the Constitution to remove the requirement that a presidential candidate should be younger than 75 years. President Museveni, 73, would have been ineligible to vie in the next election in 2021. The passage of the Bill which President Museveni is expected to assent to later this month means that that hurdle has been removed.  
Breaching house rules
“She was in a difficult position. She was caught up between toeing the party line as vice chairperson and herself,” said Abdu Katuntu, a legislator from the opposition party Forum for Democratic Change.
Ms Kadaga is accused of breaching house rules during the debate when she suspended six legislators who alerted her of the breaches, overruling concerns of the debate being sub judice in view of court challenges including at the East African Court of Justice.
However, there were no court injunctions. She also allowed voting on three matters despite noting that they were not part of the original Bill.
“In the committee report [Legal and Parliamentary Affairs] there are three matters that were not part of the Bill. These include issues of term limit, and adjusting tenure of the president and parliament. How did they come to be part of the Bill and to whom are they addressed?” she asked. The clauses proposed the term of the president and parliament be extended to seven years, from five years.
Ms Kadaga is also accused of allowing members to enter the chambers while voting was going on against the rule that there should be no movement in and out of the House. There were also questions why she did not task the Legal Affairs Committee chairman Jacob Oboth-Oboth to explain why the report was being debated on tabling instead of waiting for three days as parliamentary procedure demands.   
The debate came on the back of tense caucus meetings and constituency consultations where several legislators faced hostility from their voters opposed to age limit removal. Members of Parliament opposed to the removal were also accosted by the police during some consultations.
“If the Bill is assented to; It might be legal but not legitimate because the whole process was fraudulent,” said leader of opposition in parliament Winnie Kiiza.

No comments :

Post a Comment