Many great ideas are going to waste for lack of funding. Yet in
2013, Parliament passed the Science, Technology and Innovation Act
(STIA), which created the National Innovation Agency (NIA), National
Research Fund (NFR) and the National Commission for Science, Technology,
and Innovation.
These agencies have a role to play in research and innovation. The agency that is relevant to my topic today is the NIA.
Its
role as stated in its website includes resource mobilisation,
partnership and linkages; innovation development and management; and,
idea funding.
My interest is due to the fact that I
encounter many young people with fundable ideas but who have no clue
that their own country has mechanisms to fund good ideas or help them
protect their intellectual property.
Some of these youth find it easier to get funding from other sources than from the agency responsible to fund ideas.
On
commercialisation of ideas, the agency offers the following services:
ensuring that potential innovations receive adequate development and
marketing resources for success, identifying and formulating strategies
for market formation of local innovation products, increasing awareness
of intellectual property rights among innovators, acquiring rights or
interests in or to any technological innovation supported by the agency
from any person or assign any person any rights in or to such
technological innovation, develop the national capacity and
infrastructure to protect and exploit intellectual property derived from
research or financed by the agency and facilitate institution of legal
action for infringement of any intellectual property rights.
Every
one of these functions is a major problem to young innovators as they
spend a great deal of time getting help from all other sources except
NIA.
It is possible that NIA may not have a budget to market itself
to the people they ought to serve even though some of the answers to
most problems may not always be funds.
Further, there could be a structural problem between those who need such services and those who are supposed to supply them.
NIA should borrow a leaf on how to meet the needs of those in need from those countries that have successful programmes.
For
example, in Denmark, they seek anyone with a strong idea and desire for
new knowledge, anyone ready for a collaboration that addresses a
societal challenge and stimulates economic growth, or anyone with an
entrepreneurial mind-set they can help grow.
In
essence, they look for fundable ideas to nurture. In contrast, we may be
waiting for those with good ideas to approach the offices of NIA. The
latter philosophy never works since highly creative people despise
seeking help even when they need it.
The Global
Innovation Fund (GIF), which has in the past supported many Kenyan
start-ups, has developed a unique hybrid investment fund that supports
the piloting, rigorous testing, and scaling of innovations targeted at
improving the lives of the poorest people in developing countries.
This
fund supports a portfolio of innovations that collectively open up
opportunities and improve the lives of millions across the developing
world.
Closer
home, South Africa’s Technology Innovation Agency scouts for new ideas
through different channels such as open innovation initiatives,
catalyses partnerships between small enterprises, industries,
universities and science councils to develop an enabled environment
supporting sector-specific innovations for global competitiveness,
provide risk funding and support for innovators to progress ideas
towards market entry and commercialisation, attract and facilitate
late-stage funding (companies, industries, venture capital firms, and
development finance institutions) for the commercialisation of market
ready technologies.
Other interventions include
reduction of barriers of access to expensive high-end skills and
equipment for innovators by repositioning Technology Stations and
Platforms.
TIA’s specific role in this regard is to
fund and support host institutions to provide relevant service
offerings, and continually gather valuable intellectual capital on best
practice in technology innovation.
This has
strengthened the capability of the agency to inform and provide advice
on policy issues, frameworks and mechanisms relating to the advancement
of technology innovation. Let’s change our innovation funding
philosophy.
No comments :
Post a Comment