A bid by the Central Bank to review the lending rate ceiling is bound to
meet resistance from interested quarters among other consumer lobbies
and a section of MPs. PHOTO | FILE
The Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) Governor Patrick Njoroge has
heightened his pitch for deregulation of interest rates, saying that
reversal of the year-old law is necessary because of the negative effect
it has had on the economy.
But consumer lobbies and
some economic experts now warn that while the subsequent credit crunch
after the law was effected last September bear serious implications to
the private sector, scrapping the controls may not be the panacea, and
would in fact lead the country back to the era of high rates whose
consumer outcry prompted the controls in the first place.
The
Banking (Amendment) Act, 2016, which came into force on September 14
last year, caps loan charges at four percentage points above the Central
Bank Rate (CBR), presently standing at 10 per cent, and requires
lenders to pay interest of at least 70 per cent of the CBR on term
deposits.
President Uhuru Kenyatta last August defied
critics and overruled some of his top advisers, including the CBK
governor who publicly declared their opposition to the law, arguing that
it would distort the market. Banks now say after this income from
lending has fallen.
“Banks aren’t lending because they
are not able to price in risk adequately into an interest rate so their
margin of profit has shrunk on account of the rate cap as it doesn’t
allow for full pricing of default risk by the bank,” said Daniel Kuyoh, a
senior investment analyst at Alpha Africa asset managers.
CREDIT SLOWDOWN
Growth of credit to the private sector fell for the eighth straight month in May following the introduction of the law.
CBK
data shows loans to the private sector fell further to 2.1 per cent
over the 12 months to May this year down from the 2.4 per cent recorded
in April.
Private sector credit, however rose to 1.6
per cent in August from 1.4 per cent in July, but far from the over 17
per cent in December 2015.
Njoroge has argued that
commercial banks in a post rate cap environment have to be “more
disciplined in the pricing of loans so as not to overcharge borrowers.”
The
caps shaved Sh26.3 billion off commercial banks’ lending income in the
first six months of the year, setting them for lower profitability this
year.
“All I can tell you is that it is in our interest
as a country. It is in our interest as a central bank to work to
reverse these measures and go back to a regime where interest rates are
freely determined, but in a disciplined environment,” Dr Njoroge has
said.
“What needs to change is the discipline among
lending institutions. They cannot go ahead setting interest rates the
way they were doing before. And it is our job to deal with them in the
context of that market discipline.”
But consumer
lobbies and a section of economists are now questioning the spirited
push for deregulation by banks and the governor warning that removing
the rate controls without critical structural reforms will not
necessarily solve the perennial challenge of high rates charged to
consumers.
“It is laughable that Dr Njoroge thinks a
website by the banks and for banks will enhance transparency in pricing
of credit. It’s akin to imagining possibility of different results if
the same formula is applied. Dr Njoroge is a captive of banks and the
unrealistic IMF ideologies which purport a protectionist view of the
market by over-exposing the consumer,” said Consumer Federation of Kenya
(Cofek) secretary general Stephen Mutoro.
While admitting price controls are inherently problematic, Mr Mutoro claimed banks have ensured the rate caps are unworkable.
“I
do not support price controls but from the experience of fuel price
setting by Energy Regulatory Commission it has proven that banks can
only be tamed by restrictions in pricing their loans,” he said.
CUSTOMERS EXPOSED
According
to Standard Investment Bank head of research, Francis Mwangi, the race
for better returns in an increasingly competitive regulatory and legal
environment is likely to compel banks to chase for better returns for
shareholders.
This may leave customers exposed to higher rates unlike posited by the Central Bank governor.
“The
IFRS 9 exerts much more pressure on banks to try and charge more. So if
that is removed there is strong likelihood that prices for loans will
go back to where they were before,” says Mr Mwangi.
The
implementation of the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS)
9 from January 1, 2018 will come with stringent conditions on how banks
account for non-performing loans which is expected to trim the size of
their of loan books.
Independent analyst Aly Khan
Satchu said the era of high returns for lenders is gone and they should
readjust their banking models other than seek to squeeze huge margins
from borrowers.
“My overarching sense is that the horse
has bolted and that banks still have to take significant pain in
right-sizing their businesses and take further cost out of the equation.
Furthermore, The new digitised banking world is moving into clear
view,” said Mr Khan.
Mr Khan argued that even with the
scrapping of rate cap unless the Treasury tames its appetite for local
debt there is bound to be continued crowding out of the productive
sectors of the economy from the loans market.
“The Government of Kenya will have to reign in their borrowing appetite,” he said.
Mr Kuyoh said the CBK needs to be more proactive in ensuring an adequate and effective way of credit pricing.
Mr Kuyoh said the CBK needs to be more proactive in ensuring an adequate and effective way of credit pricing.
“The
micro lenders like Branch, Alternative Circle and Tala have already
devised a ringfenced mechanism using consumer data to price credit and
this is a step in the right direction that the regulator and the
mainstream banks seem to be playing catch up to,” he said.
No comments :
Post a Comment