The prolonged electioneering period is not helping Kenya’s competitiveness, a new report shows.
Even
though the World Economic Forum (WEF) Global Competitive Report
2017-2018 shows that the country climbed five places to position 91, its
second highest ranking in the past decade, a number of investors have
delayed decisions prior and post the General Election citing jitters.
It
says competitiveness is stalling across sub-Saharan Africa resulting in
increased volatility and uncertainty in the business environment.
The government is projecting economic growth at 5.5 per cent due to drought and political noise among other factors.
STRENGTHS
Among
Kenya’s strengths in global competitiveness is a very efficient labour
market which was ranked 27th by WEF, strong innovation at number 37, and
respectable financial market development at position 55.
Kenya’s macro-economic environment was ranked 120, becoming a big drag on its overall score.
“Global
competitiveness will be more and more defined by the innovative
capacity of a country. Talents will become increasingly more important
than capital and, therefore, the world is moving from the age of
capitalism into the age of talentism.
Countries
preparing for the fourth industrial revolution and simultaneously
strengthening their political, economic and social systems will be the
winners in the competitive race of the future,” said Klaus Schwab,
founder and executive chairman World Economic Forum.
TOP ECONOMIES
The top three economies in the region are Mauritius (45), Rwanda (58) and South Africa (61).
Only Ethiopia, Senegal, Tanzania and Uganda have managed to improve performance consecutively for five years since 2010.
The report measured factors that are crucial to future productivity and prosperity, drawing on 10 years of data.
The
report offered unique insight into how the global economy has adjusted
since the 2008 financial crisis, as well as how prepared it is to adapt
to the disruptions of the fourth industrial revolution.
VOLATILITY
“After
four years of improvement, performance in the institutions pillars has
worsened this year – particularly in South Africa, Lesotho and Zambia,
while elections in Rwanda, Kenya, Liberia and the Democratic Republic of
Congo (DRC) have increased volatility and uncertainty in the African
business environment,” said the WEF report.
It
said these negative trends have been partly compensated by improvements
in infrastructure, health, technological readiness and business
sophistication, although Africa remains below the global average in
these areas.
There is however significant variation across countries.
“Mauritius
is again the most competitive country in Africa, at 45 in the overall
Global Competitive Index (GCI), with its main rivals falling back: South
Africa drops 14 places to 61 and Rwanda drops seven places to 58.
IMPROVED COUNTRIES
The
most improved African countries year-on-year are Madagascar (121, up
seven), Gambia (117, up six), Kenya (91, up five), and Senegal (106, up
six), thanks either to an improved macroeconomic environment (Madagascar
and Senegal) or to the efficiency of goods, labour, and financial
markets (Gambia and to a lesser extent Kenya),” said WEF.
The
report noted that restoring macroeconomic stability and institutional
trust are short-term priorities to reignite competitiveness and growth
in Africa.
In the long run, continued
investment in infrastructure, human capital and technological adoption
will be needed to reduce productivity gaps.
The
report is an annual assessment of the factors driving countries’
productivity and prosperity. For the ninth consecutive year, GCI ranked
Switzerland as the world’s most competitive economy, narrowly ahead of
the United States (US) and Singapore.
Other G20 economies in the top 10 are Germany (5), the United Kingdom (8) and Japan (9).
China
is the highest ranking among the Brazil, Russia, India, China and South
Africa (BRICS) group of large emerging markets, moving up one rank to
27.
GREATEST CONCERN
Drawing on data going back 10 years, the report highlighted in particular three areas of greatest concern.
These
include the financial system, where levels of “soundness” have yet to
recover from the shock of 2007 and in some parts of the world are
declining further.
This is especially
of concern given the important role the financial system will need to
play in facilitating investment in innovation related to fourth
industrial revolution.
Another key
finding is that competitiveness is enhanced, not weakened, by combining
degrees of flexibility within the labour force with adequate protection
of workers’ rights. It said that with vast numbers of jobs set to be
disrupted as a result of automation and robotisation, creating
conditions that can withstand economic shock and support workers through
transition periods will be vital.
The
GCI data also suggested that the reason innovation often fails to
ignite productivity is due to an imbalance between investments in
technology and efforts to promote its adoption throughout the wider
economy.
No comments :
Post a Comment