Investment firm Centum has in recent years
held the distinction as the company whose employees enjoy the best
remuneration in Kenya. That outstanding level of staff compensation has
its roots in the Centum’s bonus policy, which, unlike many companies, is
not based on annual profits but on the growth of net asset value.
Centum chief executive James Mworia, who has recently been in the news over his remuneration, talked with the Business Daily’s Victor Juma about the business environment, this bonus policy and other subjects.
---
How many employees does Centum have and how many are eligible for bonuses?
We are 140 and everyone from management to the lowest participates. This includes those working for subsidiaries.
The bonus is based on growth of net asset value (NAV); right?
No, it is based on cash returns.
So, it was changed because previous annual reports said it is based on growing NAV above 15 per cent.
Since
we came up with the policy in 2009, it has not had a lot of
modifications. The bonus policy takes into account market-based
movements.
So, even if we have a revaluation of
assets, it does not go into the calculation. You must have a
market-based transaction, meaning either realised gains, dividends or
where the company has had a market transaction, meaning the value is
based on a realised price. The hurdle rate is 15 per cent and whatever
is above that is what goes into the bonus pool. The annual report is
abridged and does not go into details of how the bonus is calculated.
We
shall soon publish a detailed version of the bonus policy for
transparency. The calculation of the bonus — and this is where the
detailed bonus computation comes — is really based on cash returns to
the company and not on the book value. If it was based on book value, it
would have been on a different multiple. So, we don’t take into account
revaluation movements. In the total return statement, revaluation
movements are included.
So, for example, if you buy
land and get development plan approval and the valuation changes, those
valuation movements are factored in the total return. For purposes of
calculating the bonus, all those revaluations are removed. The only
thing you are left with is the cash return.
What
was the reason for setting up the bonus plan and why are employees
rewarded in cash while shareholders get gains that may or may not
reflect on the share price?
When we conceived
it, the objective was to drive growth in value and to incentivise the
management to either realise that value or back up that value based on
market transactions.
Because we are an investment
company, sometimes the returns tend to be lumpy, i.e. returns can be
huge in some years because of the investment profile.
What
we wanted to do is to reduce the fixed component of the remuneration of
the team because the biggest component of our costs at the time was
salaries. We wanted to have a structure where the fixed salary bit was
relatively modest and then you have a cash bonus bit which is tied to
your ability to create cash returns.
So that’s why we
established it with a view to ensuring that in aggregate, our total
costs don’t go above a ceiling of 2.5 per cent of assets at the time.
What has happened over time is that total costs have actually been
coming down.
By end of 2016, our total cost as a
proportion of assets came down to 1.3 per cent inclusive of the bonuses.
So the bonus is now the bigger part of remuneration but it is a
variable pay. So in any given year if cash return is low, the bonus is
also going to come down.
Let us talk about
Centum’s dividend policy. There was a freeze and then you started paying
dividends recently. Will the payouts continue?
Let
me take a step back and explain why we came up with that (zero
dividend) policy in 2009. We introduced it because we were focusing on
growth and wanted to use internally generated funds to finance that
growth. During that time, the share price was closely correlated with
the NAV per share and the two moved up in tandem.
The
thinking was that as a shareholder, you can create your own dividend by
selling part of your shares. In the last three years, several things
have happened.
We’ve continued to grow but then as the
business has matured, the assets we were creating have generated cash
from operations or by being sold. So we reached a point where we were
able to pay a dividend.
The second point is that the
stock price fell below book value. So we don’t want to encourage our
shareholders to sell their shares at a discount. That then made us start
paying dividends.
On the undervalued stock, what happened to plans to remedy this by buying back shares?
There
are several issues with the share repurchase. I think regulations of
the details of how to go about the repurchase are not yet in place. But
share repurchase works under several conditions. The market price must
be at a discount to the company’s value which is the case here. The
company should have surplus cash. Finally, for the company to opt to
repurchase its shares, it should not have other better ways of using the
cash it has.
This last condition has not been
satisfied in the sense that the cash we have can be better deployed on
the investments we are pursuing. We also took a decision to reduce
borrowings this year.
In this context, it is not appropriate to repurchase shares which is the same as returning capital to shareholders.
Can one deduce that you will keep paying dividends as long as the share price remains depressed?
My
own ambition is to raise the dividend and at worst maintain it because
our focus now is to generate cash from the investments we have been
making and we have no debt maturity in the short term. We believe we can
generate enough cash to pay dividend, interest expenses and fund
investments.
On the debt issue, you recently
redeemed your corporate bond using a Sh5 billion loan from Rand Merchant
Bank (RMB) of South Africa. This is more of a debt rollover than
reduction.
The net debt repayment was Sh2.7
billion. We owed RMB Sh3 billion and had a Sh4.2 billion corporate bond.
Both were due this year. So we paid the Sh3 billion RMB loan and took a
fresh loan of Sh5 billion from the bank.
There were
equity-linked notes in the corporate bond whose redemption value was
roughly Sh200 million. The total amount we paid bondholders was Sh4.7
billion, including accrued interest. So the net debt reduction is Sh2.7
billion which is not an insignificant number.
Centum
recently revalued its minority stake at Isuzu East Africa – writing it
down by Sh1.6 billion based on the price Isuzu Motors used to acquire
GM’s 57.7 per cent stake in the motor dealer. Is this an indication that
Centum’s valuation is aggressive?
In this
particular case we have to go with the most recent transaction price,
which was not in our control. However, if you look at most of our exits,
we have received more than the value at which we carried those
investments.
We believe proper valuation is validated
by market transactions. So, it is not a case of buying land, revaluing
it up and asking for a bonus.
No comments :
Post a Comment