Indications are that global crude oil
over-supply will linger on much longer, and this will slow down the
upward movement of prices. When the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting
Countries (Opec) decided last November to strengthen oil prices by
reducing production by 1.8 million barrels per day(bpd), global oil
prices complied and increased to a range of $50-55.
But
this increase was fuelled more by speculative push by traders than by
tangible net decrease in global stocks. As Opec reduces production, new
volumes add up elsewhere outside the cartel.
Oil
prices had previously dropped from above $100 in mid 2014 to as low as
$26 early last year prompted by a number of producers in Opec who
over-produced to flood the market and price-out high cost producers who
were gradually taking over Opec market shares. It is this price collapse
that the Opec is now correcting with production cuts which so far have
raised prices to $50-55.
Last week, oil prices crawled
back to about $47, prompting a new conversation centred on the
sustainability of Opec strategy to reduce production to force prices up.
In reality, Opec plans and intentions appear illogical in that any
increase in prices achieved by Opec is having the reverse effect.
Price
increases are motivating more production elsewhere as profitability
improves. And this is exactly what is happening with the US shale oil
ventures.
The effectiveness (or futility) of the “trial
and error” experiments by Opec is what they will be reviewing in their
meeting later this month. They will have to decide whether to renew,
modify or discontinue with the ongoing production cut strategies.
Opec
may have failed to appreciate and consider changing global oil supply,
demand and price dynamics. On the supply side, in the near to medium
term, global production is likely to continue increasing.
This is because the capital and technology deployed in
new and difficulty oil fields during the 10 years of high oil prices are
now mature and producing projects. Even at $50 these assets may be
producing profitable oil which Opec cannot wish away.
After
the recent oil price collapse, the US shale oil producers are now able
to produce more crude cheaper as they embraced new production methods
and technologies. I read a recent caption that improved technology will
enable BP to extract an extra one billion barrels of oil from existing
fields in the Gulf of Mexico. Russians are poised to move into the
Arctic region to drill more oil.
On the demand side,
growth in global oil consumption is slower than growth in new oil
production. Energy use efficiencies, greener and cleaner alternatives,
and new vehicle technologies are all conspiring to slow down oil
demands.
It is the simultaneous scenarios of increasing
production and decreasing demands that will continue to sustain
over-supply and depressed prices in the short to medium term.
This
is on course unless there is a substantial geopolitical incident that
significantly impacts the oil supply systems, or the Opec decides to go
for a brave experiment on much larger production cuts.
For
a net importer of oil like Kenya, future depressed prices are a good
economic story due to reduced pressure on balance of payments and cost
of energy.
However, as a prospective oil exporter,
this is not an encouraging story as upstream investors will remain shy
and slow in committing timely investments to develop and commercialise
our oil reserves.
Uganda, on the other hand, appears
determined to proceed to commercialise their oil finds (exports and
refining) at the current prices. Two of their investors are heavily
capitalised and can take risks with future oil prices. Uganda’s larger
oil volumes also give them stronger economies of scale.
Tanzania
is essentially a natural gas story which is not adversely impacted by
the oil prices as ready markets exist in the Far East. Tanzania is also
already locally commercialising some of their natural gas discoveries
through power generation and feed to industries.
Whatever
plans the Opec decide to pursue later this month, they had better be
anchored on realistic supply and demand fundamentals.
No comments :
Post a Comment