The recent announcement by the oil
investors in Turkana that a new oil discovery has been made at Emekuya-1
well in Block 13T and an earlier discovery in January at Erut-1 in the
same Block, will improve Turkana assets value and project economics.
With
only one rig deployed, the investors have in the past two years been
undertaking exploration and appraisal drilling to search for more oil,
while confirming the extractable oil volumes from the basin.
The investment objective is to ultimately produce commercially sufficient oil for export via a pipeline through Lamu port.
This
investment model is not to be confused with the ongoing early oil
project to export about 2,000 barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil by road
via Mombasa.
Early oil commercialisation is an
operational necessity to evacuate oil that accumulates during
exploration and appraisal drilling operations.
Since
drilling started five years ago, as much as 60,000 barrels of oil has
accumulated in storage tanks in Turkana. The government has also stated
that the early oil will additionally facilitate testing of the export
market.
The official figure for confirmed commercial
oil reserves as published in the 2017 Economic Survey is 750 million
barrels, which approximates to 80,000bpd over a 25 years project life.
Investors have stated that with the recent discoveries
they are now nearing a figure of one billion barrels — equivalent to
about 100,000bpd.
In respect of Turkana oil we have
the production investors and soon we shall have pipeline investors and
each is looking for an adequate return on investment. There are three
key factors that will influence project economics and investor’s return.
First, for both the oil production and pipeline
investments, the volume of available oil is a critical driver of
economies of scale. It is a divisor that sets the unit capital and
operating costs for the projects.
When we had Ugandans
partnering with Kenya on the pipeline joint-venture, the combined
volume of oil from both countries provided sufficient critical mass for a
correctly sized pipeline from Lake Albert to Lamu.
With
Uganda now routing their exports via Tanzania, any new oil discovered
in Turkana improves the oil production and pipeline investment
economics.
Second, the realisable export price on crude
oil sales delivered to the final purchaser (a refinery somewhere in
Asia) is a key project economic input. When we discovered oil in Turkana
in 2012, oil prices were above $100 per barrel but today the price is
hovering around $55.
Although investors argue that the
investments can break even at this price, it is the uncertainty of
future price profile that is slowing down final investment decisions.
Third,
the cost of transportation of oil to export destinations is another
important project economic input for the oil producers.
The
pipeline tariff has to be low enough to make oil exports competitive,
but high enough to motivate the pipeline investors. Higher volumes of
oil will help distribute pipeline capital and operating costs to a lower
tariff.
Yes, new discoveries are good for Turkana oil
profitability, especially when prices are reluctant to sustainably move
above the stubborn $55 level.
And many are asking when
Kenya can expect to export first oil via Lamu. The year 2022 has been
floated but my opinion is that this is quite ambitious and the date
could be slightly later.
Even if the oil prices shot
through the roof today, we still do not have in place the legal,
regulatory, fiscal and institutional framework necessary to make
investors open their chequebooks.
Further, the same
fears and issues that scared off the Ugandan investors from
participating in a pipeline venture via northern Kenya have not been
fully addressed and these include perceived insecurity and absence of
access infrastructure. Community relations issues are still potentially
disruptive.
Yes as we continue to discover more oil
and wait for prices to strengthen, there is a need to proactively
address known barriers to quick investment decisions.
No comments :
Post a Comment