By DICTA ASIIMWE
In Summary
- Uganda is now projected to register its second lowest growth rate in two decades at 3.9 per cent.
- For the 2016/17 financial year, the government is blaming the drought for the economy’s poor performance.
- The service industry has not been badly hit by the latest economic slowdown and actually recorded growth. But experts say the sector just grows itself and employs only a few people.
Uganda is now projected to register its second lowest growth
rate in two decades at 3.9 per cent, as a result of the drought that
has ravaged large parts of the country leading to low agricultural
output.
The lowest growth over these past two decades was registered in
the 2012/13 financial year after a drought and austerity measures meant
to mop up excess liquidity from an expensive election in February 2011
saw the economic growth slow down to 3.3 per cent.
For the 2016/17 financial year, the government is blaming the drought for the economy’s poor performance.
Secretary to the Treasury Keith Muhakanizi says that the
Treasury has had to revise the GDP downwards to 3.9 per from the
projected 5 per cent due to the massive crop failure and low livestock
productivity. A drought and an armyworm invasion devastated crops and
livestock in many parts of the country.
Agriculture contributes a modest 26 per cent to Uganda’s GDP compared with the services sector, which contributes 49 per cent.
Cannot spur growth
The service industry has not been badly hit by the latest
economic slowdown and actually recorded growth. But experts say the
sector is structured to just grow itself and not the economy since it
employs only a few people, compared with agriculture where over 70 per
cent of the population is employed.
Ezra Munyambonera, a senior research fellow at the Economic
Policy Research Centre (EPRC) said that while the services sector in
Uganda isn’t doing poorly, it is detached from primary sectors like
agriculture and manufacturing, so it lacks the ability to spur economic
growth, and creates distortions instead.
“A services sector that is not growing with manufacturing and
agriculture doesn’t create a multiplier effect through employment and
investment. It creates distortions in the economy instead,” he said.
This, he added, partly explains why after registering high
growth figures until 2010, Uganda’s economy has stagnated, and is not
registering the 7 per cent required for the country to achieve
middle-income status by 2020 and eliminate poverty by 2030.
In the April Africa Pulse report, the World Bank
classified Uganda as a stagnated economy while neighbouring Rwanda,
Kenya and Tanzania were classified as growing at a steady pace.
But Mr Muhakanizi says that the government will use budgetary
interventions to solve the problems that have been slowing Uganda’s
economy and that in the 2017/18 financial year, growth will increase to
between 5 and 6 per cent. After this, he expects the economy to continue
on an upward trajectory.
Low investment
To achieve this, the government will this year increase
allocations to extension work and irrigation, as these investments will
protect farmers against the vagaries of nature.
According to the Budget Framework Paper, the government will
this year invest an extra Ush23 billion ($6.4 million) in irrigation
services, while Ush4 ($1 million) will be used for quality assurance,
monitoring and support to extension workers.
Mr Muhakanizi says these are important investments since
underperformance in the agricultural sector affects other areas,
especially agro-based manufacturing, citing the sugar industry, where
scarcity of cane has led to a sharp increase in sugar prices.
But other experts say the investment in agriculture is still too
low. For the 2017/2018 financial year, budgetary allocation to
agriculture will stagnate at 3.1 per cent and the sector will receive
Ush863.4 billion ($231 million) out of the Ush28.3 trillion ($7.8
billion) that is planned for the 2017/2018 financial year.
And the underfunded priorities, according to the Civil Society
Budget Advocacy Group (CSBAG), include the provision of extension work.
The advocacy group argues that although extension services will
provide more funding that will see one extension service worker for
every 1,500 farmers from a low of one extension worker for 2,400
farmers, their numbers will still be too low to make a difference. The
United Nations ratio is one extension worker for every 500 farmers.
No comments :
Post a Comment