THE dispute on attachment of 1,092,000,130 shares of Vodacom has reached a new turn following a fresh move by businessman Moto Mabanga of DRC to demand over 10bn/-from Vodacom Tanzania Limited, for allegedly publishing defamatory statements against him.
However, Vodacom Tanzania Limited have
denied the claims by the businessman and their lawyers from IMMMA
Advocates have plainly indicated to strongly defend any claim that Mr
Mabanga would wish to tender before the court of law at his own risk.
In a demand letter served on the
company, Mabanga’s lawyers stated that on March 16, this year, their
client filed a suit before the High Court’s Commercial Division for
enforcement of a decree by Kinshasa Court against Vodacom International
Limited over the shares held by Vodacom Group Limited.
Having been served with pleadings, it is
stated, Vodacom Tanzania Limited allegedly maliciously prepared,
distributed and caused to be published in various media outlets,
electronic and print words suggesting Mabanga connected the issue with
Vodacom PLC shares sold so that he is paid his debt.
“The statement is false, malicious and
unfounded as the suit is not concerned at all with 560,000,100 Vodacom
Tanzania Plc shares that are being issued to the public for sale,” reads
part of the demand letter dated April 3, 2017 to the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer, Mr Ian Ferrao.
Rather, according to the demand letter,
the suit was concerned with attachment of 1,092,000,130 shares held by
the Vodacom Group Limited in Vodacom Tanzania Limited, the shares that
are yet to be offered to the public for sale.
Furthermore, it is stated that Vodacom
Tanzania Limited uttered and caused to be published alleged defamatory
words against the businessman suggesting that after completion of the
case in Kinshasa Court he took the complaint once again before the
International Chamber of Commerce (ICC).
“The words are false and malicious in
that Mr Moto Mabanga never instituted any proceedings in the
International Chamber of Commerce Court of Arbitration,” reads another
paragraph of the letter by lawyers of the businessman, Mnyele, Msengezi
& Company Advocates.
It is alleged that the published words
have caused the businessman to be shunned, hated, avoided and disparaged
by the right thinking members of the Tanzania society.
Such words allegedly portrayed Mabanga
as an opportunist who intends to frustrate the general public to
purchase shares offered for the sale by Vodacom Tanzania, the fact that
is false and unfounded.
Therefore, the lawyers have required the
company to pay the said 5,000,000 USD, plus the costs of the demand
notice, which is 50,000 USD within seven days of receipt of the same,
failure of which they would proceed to institute a suit against them
without further notice.
In its response to the demand letter,
Vodacom Tanzania Limited referred to several paragraphs Mr Mabanga had
stated in support of an application, pending determination of the main
suit and came up with a position that the words complained of are
neither false nor malicious and are perfectly justifiable.
“Consequently, we have been instructed
to inform you that given the contents of your client’s sworn affidavit,
the statement which is the basis of complaint is neither false nor
malicious. Our instructions are to vigorously defend any suit (Mabanga)
may wish to file (in court),” Vodacom lawyers replied.
Mr Mabanga has filed an application
before the High Court’s Commercial Division, seeking orders for
attachment of 1,092,000,130 shares of Vodacom Tanzania Public Limited
Company to recover a debt amounting to over 40bn/- he is demanding.
In the main suit, the businessman is
seeking for judgment and decree for the court to open the veils of
incorporation of Vodacom Group Limited and Vodacom Congo DRC SPRL and
that the court should find that the two companies are practically one
and the same.
Mr Mabanga is further requesting the
court to order the execution of the judgment given by Kinshasa
Commercial Court by attachment and sale of the shares held by the
Vodacom Companies to realise a decretal amount of 20,080,000 US dollars.
No comments :
Post a Comment