Twenty years ago, there were fewer than
700,000 industrial robots worldwide; today, there are 1.8 million, and
the number could soar to 2.6 million by 2019. Given these advances, it
is no wonder that many people fear for their jobs.
According
to the just released global PwC 20th CEO survey (2017), only 16 per
cent of CEOs plan to cut their company’s headcount over the next 12
months — and only a quarter of them say it’s primarily because of
technology.
Conversely, 52 per cent plan to hire more
employees. Clearly, CEOs see the value of marrying technology with
uniquely human capabilities. The skills they consider most important are
those that cannot be replicated by machines.
Employee
engagement can be described as the extent to which workers are
motivated to contribute to business success and are willing to apply
discretionary effort to accomplish tasks important to the achievement of
business goals. Why should employee engagement matter?
Numerous
studies have demonstrated that businesses with highly engaged employees
see higher customer satisfaction, have lower turnover rates, and
outperform businesses with lower levels of employee engagement. High
performing organisations and those that regularly conduct engagement
surveys and take action on them, reveal significantly higher performance
than those that do not.
You may ask what contributes
to high employee’s engagement. In November 2016, PwC’s People Analytics
released its annual Employee Engagement Landscape research study.
The
study is a representative sample (over 7,400 respondents) of full-time
employees across industries and global regions to gain insight regarding
issues and trends organisations are facing in their efforts to attract,
retain, and engage employees.
Several of the most commonly endorsed obstacles
reflected quality of staff (for example doing work for others that is
not part of one’s job, unproductive teammates, and inadequate staffing
levels) as well as broken/inefficient processes and imposition on time (
too many meetings, paperwork).
Employees are happier
if their roles are clearly defined and there is a clear career
development path. They want to feel that their contribution to business
goals is recognised.
Employees also want to feel
fairly remunerated for their work. Fair remuneration does not mean that
your organisation is paying at the top of the market, it means that you
have communicated your remuneration policy well and employees identify
with the various components that make up your package.
For
instance you may have a split between your performance based pay
(bonuses and sales incentives) and the guaranteed pay (basic pay) with
the latter taking up a lesser portion.
Unless you can
articulate the reasons for this and your employees appreciate that the
bonuses count and reward those who put in their best foot forward…the
issue of poor pay will always feature as a thorny issue in your
engagement survey results.
The world trend is to move into a consolidated total package.
Leadership
and management styles are another factor determining the level of
engagement of staff. The PwC engagement model puts the employee
landscape into four groups.
On average, only 41 per
cent of employees across the world are Champions. However in high
performing organisations, the number jumps to 74 per cent.
The
number of Disconnected employees is 24 per cent of the working
population, and number of Captives is 32 per cent, suggesting the bigger
risk for organisations is not those who are looking to leave, but
those who aren’t engaged but not planning on leaving – creating a drag
on business performance and goal attainment.
Looking at
what helps create champions and activate engagement, the strongest
driver is leadership trust and vision. Without confidence in leadership
and excitement about where the organisation is headed, it is difficult
to engage the workforce.
Other stronger drivers of
engagement include respect and fairness, growth and development as
discussed above, commitment to quality, and cooperation/collaboration.
Results
suggest that performance in these areas is more inconsistent rather
than lacking altogether. In other words, the goal for creating stronger
engagement for many organisations is consistency of action — doing the
right things most of the time rather than just some of the time.
No comments :
Post a Comment