Thursday, March 2, 2017

Lawyer in Moi, Equity Bank boss land case under probe for fraud

Corporate News Former president Daniel arap Moi. PHOTO | FILE Former president Daniel arap Moi. PHOTO | FILE 

ABIUD OCHIENG

Summary

    • A lawyer who allegedly represented retired President Daniel arap Moi in a land sale deal that is the subject of court cases is under investigation for fraud.
    • Mr Omwanza Ombati through his lawyer Edward Oonge Tuesday accused the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) of purporting to investigate his bank account over alleged fraud
    • It is alleged that Mr Moi had sold the prime land in Nairobi through lawyer Ombati to Muthaiga Luxury Homes Ltd in 2012.
A lawyer who allegedly represented retired President Daniel arap Moi in a land sale deal that is the subject of court cases is under investigation for fraud.
Mr Omwanza Ombati through his lawyer Edward Oonge Tuesday accused the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) of purporting to investigate his bank account over alleged fraud yet neither Mr Moi, nor Muthaiga Luxury Homes Ltd, a company affiliated to Equity Bank boss James Mwangi, have filed a complaint with the police alleging fraud.
“Mr Ombati acted for retired president Moi, who has not complained. The person who bought the land, has also not complained of any fraud, and the complainant still remains a puzzle to us,” lawyer Oonge told High Court judge John Mativo Tuesday.
It is alleged that Mr Moi had sold the prime land in Nairobi through lawyer Ombati to Muthaiga Luxury Homes Ltd in 2012.
The retired president has in a separate case disowned the alleged sale.
United States International University Africa (USIU-A), and US-based businessman George Kiongera, through his company Maestro Connections Health Systems Ltd, have also laid claim to the land alleging they bought it.
The investigating officer Mr Emmanuel Kanyungu has in court papers stated that on July 17, 2016 the police received a petition from the Vice Chancellor, USIU-A requesting the Inspector General of Police to commence investigations into a parcel of land it had bought, which had been grabbed.
Non-disclosure
Lawyer Oonge said that the court papers by the investigating officer show that the orders initially obtained by the DPP before a magistrate’s court to investigate the account were obtained through non-disclosure, as the complainant was a different party.
The lawyer said that Mr Ombati had previously recorded a statement with the police and that he is willing to cooperate and assist the police with the information they need.
He said the DPP is seeking to investigate bank transactions spanning a long period, which have nothing to do with the issues being investigated. He wants the DPP to be specific on particular account details sought.
Mr Kanyungu has, in court papers, claimed that Mr Ombati had been summoned to explain whether he had received instructions on behalf of Mr Moi to sell the land to Muthaiga Luxury Homes Ltd, but he was not able to prove.
“Mr Ombati was not able to demonstrate when he received instructions because the only document he availed was a letter without a letter head, dated December 18, 2012, seven months after the sale was concluded,” Mr Kanyungu said in court papers.
The investigating officer has in court papers also claimed that Mr Ombati was only able to disclose less than half of the disbursement of the purchase price to the investigation officers and when asked about the remaining, he promised to avail the details, but became evasive prompting the investigation officer to obtain orders to investigate his bank account.
Hearing resumes on May 22.

No comments :

Post a Comment