Corporate News
By REUTERS
In Summary
- While Snap's lead IPO underwriters, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs Group Inc, had an opportunity to review and draft the registration document, the more than 10 banks that have recently signed up as IPO co-managers, including Citigroup Inc and Royal Bank of Canada, have been told they cannot see it ahead of it becoming public, the sources said on Wednesday.
- Snap's stance reinforces its reputation as one the world's most secretive companies.
- The unusual move underscores Snap's relentless campaign to crack down on information leaks.
Some investment banks seeking to be added as
underwriters to Snapchat owner Snap Inc's initial public offering
registration document have been denied access to review it before it is
made public this week, according to people familiar with the matter.
The unusual move underscores Snap's relentless campaign to
crack down on information leaks. For Wall Street banks, it pits their
desire to appear on the front cover of this year's most high-profile IPO
against their reluctance to have their names featured in a regulatory
document they have not seen.
Snap's stance reinforces its reputation as one the
world's most secretive companies. It made privacy its hallmark by
developing an app that sends disappearing messages, before rebranding
itself as a "camera" company making video recording glasses and visual
effects for video taken by smartphones.
"I cannot imagine any other deal in which banks
would let something like this happen," said Christopher Austin, an
equity capital markets lawyer at Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP,
who is not involved in Snap's IPO.
While Snap's lead IPO underwriters, Morgan Stanley
and Goldman Sachs Group Inc, had an opportunity to review and draft the
registration document, the more than 10 banks that have recently signed
up as IPO co-managers, including Citigroup Inc and Royal Bank of Canada,
have been told they cannot see it ahead of it becoming public, the
sources said on Wednesday.
Instead, the Los Angeles-based company has
organized meetings with teams of banks to answer their questions about
the document, and has also made lawyers from the lead underwriters
available, the sources added.
Typically, banks have "commitment committees" to
review IPO registration documents before gaining internal permission to
have their name included in a registration document. They usually seek
assurances that disclosures on a company's business risks and accounting
standards have been made properly.
"Commitment committees are there to keep bankers from making stupid mistakes, and to protect a bank's reputation," Austin said.
Most of the new banks involved became comfortable
with their name appearing on the IPO registration document after
speaking to Snap and its lawyers, according to the sources.
Some banks are still hoping for full access to the
document before its public filing, though it is uncertain whether Snap
will acquiesce. It is still possible that Snap will agree to give some
banks access to the filing a couple of hours before it is made public,
the sources said.
The sources asked not to be identified because the
matter is confidential. Snap declined to comment. The banks either
declined to comment, or did not immediately respond to requests for
comment.
Bragging rights
Snap has already submitted its IPO registration
document with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission under the Jobs
Act, which allows companies with less than $1 billion in revenue to
file confidentially. Snap is set to update the filing and make it public
this week.
To be sure, banks hired by Snap for the IPO can
simply wait for the registration document to be made public, and then
ask for their name to be included next time the document is updated.
Once made public this week, the IPO document will likely be updated
several times before the launch of the offering that is expected in
March.
The unusual move underscores Snap's relentless campaign to
crack down on information leaks. For Wall Street banks, it pits their
desire to appear on the front cover of this year's most high-profile IPO
against their reluctance to have their names featured in a regulatory
document they have not seen.
Snap's stance reinforces its reputation as one the
world's most secretive companies. It made privacy its hallmark by
developing an app that sends disappearing messages, before rebranding
itself as a "camera" company making video recording glasses and visual
effects for video taken by smartphones.
"I cannot imagine any other deal in which banks
would let something like this happen," said Christopher Austin, an
equity capital markets lawyer at Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP,
who is not involved in Snap's IPO.
While Snap's lead IPO underwriters, Morgan Stanley
and Goldman Sachs Group Inc, had an opportunity to review and draft the
registration document, the more than 10 banks that have recently signed
up as IPO co-managers, including Citigroup Inc and Royal Bank of Canada,
have been told they cannot see it ahead of it becoming public, the
sources said on Wednesday.
Instead, the Los Angeles-based company has
organized meetings with teams of banks to answer their questions about
the document, and has also made lawyers from the lead underwriters
available, the sources added.
Typically, banks have "commitment committees" to
review IPO registration documents before gaining internal permission to
have their name included in a registration document. They usually seek
assurances that disclosures on a company's business risks and accounting
standards have been made properly.
"Commitment committees are there to keep bankers from making stupid mistakes, and to protect a bank's reputation," Austin said.
Most of the new banks involved became comfortable
with their name appearing on the IPO registration document after
speaking to Snap and its lawyers, according to the sources.
Some banks are still hoping for full access to the
document before its public filing, though it is uncertain whether Snap
will acquiesce. It is still possible that Snap will agree to give some
banks access to the filing a couple of hours before it is made public,
the sources said.
The sources asked not to be identified because the
matter is confidential. Snap declined to comment. The banks either
declined to comment, or did not immediately respond to requests for
comment.
Bragging rights
Snap has already submitted its IPO registration
document with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission under the Jobs
Act, which allows companies with less than $1 billion in revenue to
file confidentially. Snap is set to update the filing and make it public
this week.
To be sure, banks hired by Snap for the IPO can
simply wait for the registration document to be made public, and then
ask for their name to be included next time the document is updated.
Once made public this week, the IPO document will likely be updated
several times before the launch of the offering that is expected in
March.
The unusual move underscores Snap's relentless campaign to
crack down on information leaks. For Wall Street banks, it pits their
desire to appear on the front cover of this year's most high-profile IPO
against their reluctance to have their names featured in a regulatory
document they have not seen.
Snap's stance reinforces its reputation as one the
world's most secretive companies. It made privacy its hallmark by
developing an app that sends disappearing messages, before rebranding
itself as a "camera" company making video recording glasses and visual
effects for video taken by smartphones.
"I cannot imagine any other deal in which banks
would let something like this happen," said Christopher Austin, an
equity capital markets lawyer at Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP,
who is not involved in Snap's IPO.
While Snap's lead IPO underwriters, Morgan Stanley
and Goldman Sachs Group Inc, had an opportunity to review and draft the
registration document, the more than 10 banks that have recently signed
up as IPO co-managers, including Citigroup Inc and Royal Bank of Canada,
have been told they cannot see it ahead of it becoming public, the
sources said on Wednesday.
Instead, the Los Angeles-based company has
organized meetings with teams of banks to answer their questions about
the document, and has also made lawyers from the lead underwriters
available, the sources added.
Typically, banks have "commitment committees" to
review IPO registration documents before gaining internal permission to
have their name included in a registration document. They usually seek
assurances that disclosures on a company's business risks and accounting
standards have been made properly.
"Commitment committees are there to keep bankers from making stupid mistakes, and to protect a bank's reputation," Austin said.
Most of the new banks involved became comfortable
with their name appearing on the IPO registration document after
speaking to Snap and its lawyers, according to the sources.
Some banks are still hoping for full access to the
document before its public filing, though it is uncertain whether Snap
will acquiesce. It is still possible that Snap will agree to give some
banks access to the filing a couple of hours before it is made public,
the sources said.
The sources asked not to be identified because the
matter is confidential. Snap declined to comment. The banks either
declined to comment, or did not immediately respond to requests for
comment.
Bragging rights
Snap has already submitted its IPO registration
document with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission under the Jobs
Act, which allows companies with less than $1 billion in revenue to
file confidentially. Snap is set to update the filing and make it public
this week.
To be sure, banks hired by Snap for the IPO can
simply wait for the registration document to be made public, and then
ask for their name to be included next time the document is updated.
Once made public this week, the IPO document will likely be updated
several times before the launch of the offering that is expected in
March.
No comments :
Post a Comment