By BRIAN WASUNA, bwasuna@ke.nationmedia.com
In Summary
- The KDF wants Justice George Odunga to dismiss City Hall’s suit and lift an order that stopped it from denying civilians access to the link road.
- AG Githu Muigai, acting for the KDF, said the Constitution provides that intergovernmental disputes are to be resolved by the IRTC before being moved to court.
- City Hall sued the Kenya Defence Forces for restricting civilians from using the link road.
The Kenya Defence Forces (KDF) has renewed its battle
with City Hall over the Mihango-Kayole link road with an application to
have the dispute referred to the Intergovernmental Relations Technical
Committee (IRTC).
Attorney- General Githu Muigai, acting for the KDF, said in a
fresh application that the Constitution provides that intergovernmental
disputes are to be resolved by the IRTC before being moved to court.
The KDF wants Justice George Odunga to dismiss City
Hall’s suit and lift an order that stopped it from denying civilians
access to the link road.
Prof Muigai added that the Judicial Review division
of the High Court where City Hall filed its suit against the KDF has no
authority to determine land disputes, hence Justice Odunga had no
authority to entertain the case.
City Hall sued the Kenya Defence Forces for
restricting civilians from using the link road, and now claims that it
has already awarded a Sh230 million tender to Nyoro Construction Company
for upgrade of the road.
Acting county secretary Robert Ayisi said in court
documents that Nyoro is to tarmac the Mahingo road to ease CBD access
for the area’s residents. He says the KDF has illegally dug a deep
trench across the Mihango Road link and deployed armed officers to the
site.
The KDF now says that City Hall obtained a court
order ordering the military to reopen the road by withholding crucial
information from Justice Odunga. The KDF says it has been in occupation
of the land surrounding the link road since 1984.
“There is no such public road as Embakasi-Mihang’o
or Mihang’o-Kayole as the survey plan in our custody does not provide
for a public road within the garrison quarters as contended by City
Hall.”
“This court lacks jurisdiction to entertain this
matter as this is a matter that ought to be resolved through alternative
dispute resolution mechanisms and generally relates to environment and
land and more particularly planning, title, tenure and boundaries which
matters fall squarely within the ambit of the Environment and Land
Court,” Prof Muigai argued.
The county government says that the Mihango Road
has been in existence for over 30 years and is the most convenient route
for Kayole and Mihango residents to the central business districts.
But the KDF holds that there is a designated and
well recognised road that residents should use, and that the claim by
City Hall is part of a wider scheme by some county officials to grab 106
acres of land.
Prof Muigai adds that the trenches it dug along the disputed road are part of an exercise by the KDF to fence off its land.
The KDF says there are three other cases regarding ownership of the land surrounding the disputed road.
In two of the cases, private developers Darkwood
Investments and Torino Enterprises are separately seeking compensation
for the land claiming that the KDF grabbed it from them. The third case
was filed by City Hall against the KDF in 2012.
No comments :
Post a Comment