PARIS
The
year 2016 has seen a rekindling of the human desire to conquer Mars,
with public and private interests openly vying to take the first step on
the Red Planet, possibly with a stopover on the Moon.
Space-faring
nations are mostly united in viewing Mars as the next frontier with
many still pooling their money and expertise to make the dream a
reality, despite souring relations between them.
But
the election of Donald Trump — with inevitable impacts on science
policy, budgets and diplomatic relations — has cast doubts on the future
of space exploration.
Space bosses
and investors are waiting on tenterhooks for the US president-elect to
spell out his plans for NASA — and to see whether the future will be one
of cooperation or competition.
FREE NASA FROM RESTRICTION
On
the campaign trail in the space industry state of Florida, Trump said
in October he wanted to "free Nasa from the restriction of serving
primarily as a logistics agency for low-orbit activity".
He
did not go into details, but low-orbit programmes include the
International Space Station (ISS), the Hubble Space Telescope and
Earth-observation satellites.
Among them are NASA science orbiters for climate monitoring, a programme Trump has also threatened to stifle.
He
told crowds in Sanford that NASA's core mission will be space
exploration, and promised: "America will lead the way into the stars".
This could be good news for pursing Martian ambitions.
SETTLE IN MARS
Outgoing
president Barack Obama already set the goal of a round-trip mission to
the fourth rock from the Sun by the 2030s, with the "ultimate ambition"
of creating a settlement there.
That
is also the ambition of entrepreneur and SpaceX founder Elon Musk, who
launched an ambitious plan in September to establish a colony on Mars —
sending 100 humans at a time — starting in 2024.
Dutch company Mars One, similarly, plans to send explorers to Mars by 2031, funded partly by a related television reality show.
The
route to Mars may very well be via the Moon, analysts say, with the
European Space Agency mooting plans for a lunar village — a stopover for
spacecraft to destinations further afield.
Going
to Mars, said John Logsdon of the Space Policy Institute at George
Washington University, "depends on how quickly the international effort
to go back to the Moon can be assembled, how much budget the US spends
on that, what the level of the NASA budget is.
"And all those are unknown right now."
NEW SPACE RACE?
Following
years of multinational cooperation, "the current trend is for
space-faring nations to strengthen and increase national autonomy in
achieving success in space", says a European Space Policy Institute
document.
Countries want their own rockets and launchpads in case "unfavourable geopolitical developments" place their programmes at risk.
Since
the US-Soviet space race launched the first human into Earth orbit in
1961 and placed the first man on the Moon in 1969, the trend has been
towards galactic teamwork.
A high
point has been the ISS, a joint project — continuously inhabited since
2000 — of America, Europe, Russia, Japan and Canada.
With only Russia able to ferry astronauts to the orbiting science lab today, countries work together on sending cargo.
There are also joint deep-space experiments, such as the European-Russian ExoMars rover planned for 2020.
"It
used to be the US and the Soviet Union that had the capability to go
into space. Now India can do it, Japan can do it," Sa'id Mosteshar,
director of the London Institute of Space Policy and Law told AFP.
Only
China is not party to any big international projects, mainly due to its
complicated diplomatic relationship with the United States.
CHINESE SPACE STATION
But Beijing was nonetheless spending "a significant amount" on space, said Mosteshar.
It
has an orbiting space lab, plans for a manned space station by 2022,
and could become the second country to place a human on the moon. The
last was an American in 1972.
But
observers say there is no race, as such — countries, even private
corporations, are unlikely to ever have enough money to go it alone.
Most
feel space cooperation will continue — as it did even at the height of
the American-USSR cold war — in spite of what politicians do on Earth.
Trump
is seen as likely to be closer to Russia under Vladimir Putin than
Obama had been, but has already incurred the diplomatic wrath of China.
"International collaborative space projects are by nature long-term commitments," said Mosteshar.
"If
in the midst of a project there are political differences that arise
between the countries involved, it's difficult to stop the ongoing
experiment or other activity."
No comments :
Post a Comment