CONSTITUTION and Legal Affairs Minister Dr Harrison Mwakyembe has expressed concern over a number of African countries that have ratified the protocol establishing the African Court for Human and Peoples Rights (ACHPR) based here.
“Only 30 out of 54 member states have signed and ratified it.
This, therefore, means that they do not
recognise this court, thereby denying their citizens the basic right of
access to it, which is our own creation,’’ he said. The minister added
that “his immediate appeal would be for those countries that have not
ratified this protocol to consider doing so as a matter of priority.’’
Speaking during the ‘International
Symposium in Commemorating the 10th Anniversary of the African Court on
Human and People’s Rights,’ Dr Mwakyembe noted that the number of
countries that had made the Declaration to accept the competency of the
Court to receive human rights cases is discouraging.
The minister noted that only six and -
that is after the withdrawal of one member state - have made the
important declaration. “This is a clear testimony that there is no
political will and therefore many people on the continent cannot access
the Court established solely for them. It is time forus to see this
commitment differently,” stressed Dr Mwakyembe.
It was observed during the meeting that
more programmes should be conducted among African nations so as to
create more awareness about the work of the African Court in order to
give it the deserved recognition as well as encouraging more members to
take up their share of responsibility.
So far only a small number of cases have
been finalised by the court as compared to those that have been
received, thus calling for enhanced capacity and resources to support
the court.
Equally important, periodic review of
the Rules of the Court should be done in order to meet the emerging
needs and challenges from the time of filing cases, admission, hearing
and judgment delivery.
The Court’s President, Justice Sylvain
Ore, said the ten years of the legal body’s tenure in Arusha have been
successful ‘to some extent.’
He added: “Despite its usefulness, the
Legal Aid Scheme has remained with insufficient funds to cater for many
indigent or less privileged applicants. It is incumbent on all of us to
make a difference.
Otherwise, all the good intentions for the creation of this court will only remain in paper.
No comments :
Post a Comment