By SCOTT BELLOWS
In Summary
Culture represents the stunning pinnacle of human
civilisation. Culture makes us who we are as a nation, as a people, as a
community.
Inasmuch, social scientists endeavoured for decades to
clearly define culture, how to measure it, how to identify it, and how
to accentuate it.
American anthropologists Kroeber and Kluckhohn
developed more than 160 definitions of culture way back in 1952. But
essentially in more modern terms, researcher Edgar Schein delineated
that culture embodies three different main levels.
First, observable displays of culture are
considered artifacts. A newcomer to a culture may view the
manifestations of the cultural artifacts, but be unable to decipher the
underlying cultural context.
How Kenyans build homes, wear clothes, drive cars or ride on buses all may be observed as artifacts to outside observers.
Pre-colonial homes in South Sudan were very
different from homes in what was previously called Western Province from
the same period, as an example.
Researchers Susan Schneider and Jean-Louis Barsoux
narrowed down culture to inside organisations whereby one may view
artifacts in organisation charts, buildings, communications, and dress
codes.
Second, cultures hold beliefs on how the world
should be in terms of values. Values shape our behaviour and how we
judge others.
How Rwandans greet each other with a handshake
followed by two hugs accompanied with touching the sides of one’s face
against the other person’s face three times finished off with a
handshake stands remarkably different than how Kenyans greet each other
with an extended hand shake or Japanese with a bow. Further, our values
shape how we as a people judge each other.
Traditional Kikuyu culture, as an example, with its
agrarian history champions calm polite interactions and, therefore,
judges outspoken blunt individuals more harshly when compared to
traditional Luo culture with its fishing history that celebrates dissent
and challenging the status quo.
Third, the deepest levels of culture involve its basic assumptions about what is good, normal, and correct.
In Kenya, we find it acceptable and correct for
women to work and hold senior managerial positions within companies as
compared to Saudi Arabia that frowns on such gender inclusion.
Additionally, last week’s Mr and Miss Albinism
Kenya showcased Kenya’s acceptance of people with albinism in stark
contrast to elements of Tanzanian culture that view these precious
people merely as objects for witchcraft or segments of Rwandan culture
that see them as children of ghosts.
Essentially, Cristina Gibson summarised culture as
an identifiable group of individuals and the conformation of rudimentary
assumptions about people and their interconnectedness to each other and
the wider world.
Broadly, national culture links to organisational
performance via material differences in leadership, style, and
management systems within national cultures.
Researchers Rajendar Garg and Jun Ma looked at
dramatically different managerial practices between foreign-owned, joint
ventures, and Chinese-owned and operated companies.
Interestingly, Chinese manage differently from Americans and
combined management teams manage differently from either individually
as just one example among many.
What aspects stand out in Kenyan management styles
compared to the rest of the world? Kenyan executives are more likely to
deliver bad news politely in an affirmative way as compared to Indian
managers’ blunt direct tones. Kenyan managers also take longer to fire
non-performing employees than their American counterparts.
So when managing a business, one must be careful to
consider divergent views of business practices and behaviours, which
asserts that organisational practices must be tailored to work
effectively within national contexts.
The viewpoint looks at all aspects of national
disparities that the late researcher Graham Dietz highlighted including
political, social, legal, economic realities, religion, inland or
coastal, urban or rural, education level, and subcultures.
Inasmuch, organisational procedure adaptations
across national boundaries and within national regional boundaries
yields diverging practices.
More specifically, a culture-specific framework
narrows down national differences to only investigate cultural
variances. The view holds that facing various challenges clamouring for
change, cultural factors firmly rooted in the society affect how
managers approach and react to change.
Several different models have been established,
including the Hofstede model as well as the Schwartz and Bilsky
approach, Trompenaars model, and most recently the GLOBE Framework
developed by Robert House at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton
School in conjunction with an army of researchers around the world.
Last week Business Talk highlighted research conducted by Geert Hofstede, the most prolific culture writer in the past 40 years.
Every national culture also carries negatives and
Kenya is no different. Our Kenyan national culture of indifference to
corruption helps hinder our government’s delivery of critical services
to our population.
Also, our lack of attention to detail hinders our
manufacturing and production capabilities and hampers our writing
excellence. However, our positives far exceed our negatives. Kenyan
employees more heartily accept colleagues than many other cultures.
Kenyan willingness to see the brighter side of life
and our enduring hope in the future enables us to enjoy the most
prolific humour for everyday experiences in the whole world.
Finally, our own Kenyan national culture makes the
country the most generous nation in all of Africa according to the just
released CAF World Giving Index 2016. Kenyans give more to each other
than anywhere else on the continent.
So, be proud of our Kenyan national culture.
Accept the positives and realise the negatives. Do not be shy to try to
change perceived downsides of our culture among those within your
sphere of influence.
Discuss the positives and alleged negatives of Kenyan culture on Twitter through #KenyanCulture.
scott@ScottProfessor.com
Twitter: @ScottProfessor
Twitter: @ScottProfessor
No comments :
Post a Comment