By JAMES ANYANZWA
In Summary
- The European parliament extended the deadline to withdraw Kenya’s preferential market access to the EU market to February 2, 2017 after the country signed the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA), demonstrating its commitment to the trade pact.
- The deadline to remove Kenya’s preferential market access privileges had been set for October 1, meaning that from October 2 Kenyan exports to the EU would have been subject to duties, which would have made them less competitive.
- However, The EastAfrican has learnt that it is unlikely that Tanzania will relax its hardline stance during the three months and the EAC Council of Ministers is considering a proposal for variable geometry, where member states would be allowed to sign the agreement at different times.
Kenya has received a four-month reprieve to ratify the trade
agreement it signed with the European Union in Brussels on August 29,
providing a ray of hope for exporters whose shipments to the EU market
would have started attracting duty after October 1.
The European parliament extended the deadline to withdraw
Kenya’s preferential market access to the EU market to February 2, 2017
after the country signed the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA),
demonstrating its commitment to the trade pact.
“We remain committed to the Economic Partnership Agreement
reached with the East African Community, which we still expect can be
signed and applied by all concerned countries. The signature process is
ongoing with the region desirous to move ahead in unison. Meanwhile the
free market access of Kenya, which has signed the EPA, is extended
beyond 1 October until the beginning of January 2017,” said Stefano A
Dejak, European Union Ambassador to Kenya.
However, some EU Members of Parliament said Kenya has been given
up to February next year to have the deal signed by all EAC countries.
European Union MPs who revealed the four-month extension are
Helmut Scholz and Marie Arena. The deadline to remove Kenya’s
preferential market access privileges had been set for October 1,
meaning that from October 2 Kenyan exports to the EU would have been
subject to duties, which would have made them less competitive.
The EU is Kenya’s biggest export destination, taking up cut flowers, French beans, fruit, fish, textiles, coffee and tea.
“We persuaded the EU parliament not to lock us out of the
preferential terms and our request was accepted. We will now take the
document to the Kenyan parliament for ratification so as to make it
legal,” said Dr Chris Kiptoo, Kenya’s Principal Secretary in charge of
Trade.
Lawmakers from the EU parliament also told an ongoing conference
in Arusha that the deadline for signing the EPA has been extended from
October 2016 to February 2, 2017.
The deadline for the EAC member states to sign the trade
agreement as a bloc was set for October 1, 2016 but there has been
resistance from some countries.
Kenya and Rwanda have already signed the agreement while Uganda has expressed a commitment to append its signature.
Tanzania has refused to sign, saying the agreement would have
serious consequences for its revenues and the growth of its industries.
Burundi, which has been sanctioned by the EU following political
unrest, said it would not sign the trade deal, given its currently
deteriorating relationship with Europe.
Related stories
The trade deal requires that all EAC states commit to it for it to take effect.
The EPA negotiations have been undertaken by the EAC as a
bloc in line with Article 37 of the Protocol on the Establishment of the
East African Community Customs Union and the Summit decision of April
1, 2002.
The Protocol provides that EAC partner states negotiate as a
bloc on matters pertaining to participation in the World Trade
Organisation and ACP-EU arrangements (under the Cotonou Partnership
Agreement between the ACP Group of States and the European Community).
The EAC heads of state last week requested a three-month
extension to deal with the concerns of some of the remaining partner
states before signing EPA as a bloc.
The 17th Extraordinary Heads of State Summit called upon the the
EU not to punish Kenya and directed the EAC Secretariat to communicate
to EU on this matter.
However, The EastAfrican has learnt that it is unlikely
that Tanzania will relax its hardline stance during the three months
and the EAC Council of Ministers is considering a proposal for variable
geometry, where member states would be allowed to sign the agreement at
different times.
“I think we will request the Summit to consider a proposal for
countries to sign the agreement at different times if some are not
ready. There is a need to adopt a flexible approach if people are not
ready,” Betty Maina, Kenya’s Principal Secretary in charge of East
African Affairs, said.
“It is unlikely that after the three-month period we shall have a fundamental change of country positions,” she added.
Kenya has been exporting products to the EU market under the
Market Access Regulations (MAR) since 2007, but this was to be abolished
on October 1.
It is feared that failure to sign EPAs as a bloc would give rise to partner states operating in different trading regimes.
Kenya is classified as a developing country, while Uganda,
Rwanda, Burundi and Tanzania are considered Least Developed Countries.
Failure to sign EPAs would mean that Kenya’s exports to the EU market
would now start attracting duty under the Generalised Scheme of
Preference granted to developing countries.
Additional reporting by Julius Barigaba.
No comments :
Post a Comment