By CAROL MUSYOKA
In Summary
A lobbyist on his way home from Parliament after a
Parliamentary Enquiry into Trading Practices by Britain’s leading bank
executives is stuck in traffic. Several of the former bank executives
and CEOs have agreed to return their extravagant pensions.
Noticing a police officer, he winds down his window and
asks: “What’s the hold up Officer?” The policeman replies: “The chief
executive of the UK’s largest bank has become so depressed he’s stopped
his motorcade and is threatening to douse himself with petrol and set
himself on fire because of the shame of what he has done.”
“Myself and all the other motorcade police officers
are taking up a collection because we feel sorry for him.” The lobbyist
asks: “How much have you got so far?” The officer replies: “About 40
litres, but a lot of officers are still siphoning.”
It’s not that hard to find bad banker jokes these
days, they are the most vilified professionals after tax collectors. But
malign them as we will, the banking industry has been a key driver of
the economy through provision of working capital facilities for
businesses, unsecured loans for individuals and employment for many
Kenyans, not to mention a safe place to keep our funds.
It is evident that there has been exponential
growth in banking, all driven by Kenyans contributing to economic growth
and generating more capital. Deposits have grown by a factor of almost
seven while loans have grown by a factor of 12.
Look at what the Central Bank (CBK) said in 2002
while reporting about the state of the industry: “Traditionally
institutions in the local market have relied on interest income on loans
and government securities as their major source of income. In the last
few years, there has been a shift to government securities owing to lack
of borrowers due to the depressed state of the economy.
In the last one-year, the Treasury bill rates have
been falling dramatically, thus compelling institutions to look for
alternative sources of income to meet their operational costs and report
profits for their shareholders.
Some of these sources, especially increased fees
and commissions have placed them on a collision course with the public.
In an attempt to reduce their costs, some institutions have initiated
restructuring programmes that include staff retrenchment and
rationalisation of their branch network. These measures have met
resistance from the general public and trade unions.”
A few years later CBK legislated that banks
required their approval before introducing new fees in a bid to reduce
the collision course so identified.
The result is that as the economy took an upswing following the Kibaki administration’s fairly successful macroeconomic policies, loans ended up being an easier way to grow the bottom line.
The result is that as the economy took an upswing following the Kibaki administration’s fairly successful macroeconomic policies, loans ended up being an easier way to grow the bottom line.
Banking industry’s income
In 2002, interest income of Sh41.5 billion (which
includes interest from loans, government securities and placement of
funds with other institutions) made up 70 per cent of the banking
industry’s income. In 2015, the interest income of Sh359.5 billion made
up 78.7 per cent of the banking industry’s income.
Put it another way, innovation has been the
furthest thing on the minds of bankers over the last decade. With the
requirement to seek approval for new fees as well as the voracious
appetite for loans, lending in this country has been a no-brainer for
years.
But Kenyan banks are also responsible for a fairly
broad financial access, at least compared to its neighbours. The CBK
Banking Supervision Report 2015 reports as much by quoting a joint study
with FSD Kenya and the World Bank titled “Bank Financing of SMEs in
Kenya” that was published in September 2015: “A) Involvement of Kenyan
banks in the SME segment has grown between 2009 and 2013.
The total SME lending portfolio in December 2013
was estimated at Sh332 billion, representing 23.4 per cent of the banks’
total loan portfolio while in 2009, this figure stood at Sh133 billion,
representing 19.5 per cent of the total loan portfolio.
B) The preferred source of financing for a large
number of SMEs is overdrafts despite the fact that banks have introduced
several trade finance and asset finance products designed for the SME
market. C) The share of SME lending relative to total lending by
commercial banks is higher in Kenya (23.4 per cent) compared to other
major markets in Sub Saharan Africa like Nigeria (five per cent) and
South Africa (eight per cent). According to a study quoted in the
report, this ratio is at 17 per cent in Rwanda and 14 per cent in
Tanzania placing Kenya as the leading country among the five countries
referred to in the study.”
SMEs are the cogs that move the wheels of this and many emerging
market economies. They cannot survive without bank funding and the
interest rate regime change is very likely to upset the status quo and
roll back the gains made by Kenya in deepening financial access to this
critical sector of the economy.
This is largely because SME lending has typically been
collateralized to mitigate the risks. A reduction in the interest rate
without a reduction in the corresponding credit risk of the SME
borrower, together with no improvement in the legal framework for
realizing collateral from defaulted borrowers is a recipe for reduced
SME lending appetite.
However as a bank CEO said to me a few days ago, “I
asked my staff today: is there no other way to make money apart from
loans?” and all he got were blank stares in return.
The ground is shifting under the feet of banks, not
only legislatively but even technologically with the entry of Fintechs
in the same lending space that banks have traditionally played in. We
might very well be standing on the cusp of a financial innovation wave
in Kenya.
Carol.musyoka@gmail.com
Twitter: @carolmusyoka
Twitter: @carolmusyoka
No comments :
Post a Comment