By REUTERS
In Summary
- Apple's chief executive Tim Cook described an European Union ruling that it must pay a huge tax bill to Ireland as "total political crap", but France joined Germany on Thursday in backing Brussels as transatlantic tensions grow.
- European Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager dismissed Cook's broadside, saying the demand for a 13 billion euro ($14.5 billion) back tax payment was based on the facts.
- But in Ireland itself, public opinion and the government are divided over whether to take the windfall - which would fund the country's health system for a year - or reject it in the hope of maintaining a low tax regime that has attracted many multinationals and the jobs they create.
Apple's chief executive Tim Cook described an
European Union ruling that it must pay a huge tax bill to Ireland as
"total political crap", but France joined Germany on Thursday in backing
Brussels as transatlantic tensions grow.
European Competition Commissioner Margrethe
Vestager dismissed Cook's broadside, saying the demand for a 13 billion
euro ($14.5 billion) back tax payment was based on the facts.
Washington has lined up with the tech giant,
accusing the EU of trying to grab tax revenue that should go to the
United States government.
But in Ireland itself, public opinion and the
government are divided over whether to take the windfall - which would
fund the country's health system for a year - or reject it in the hope
of maintaining a low tax regime that has attracted many multinationals
and the jobs they create.
Apple has said it will appeal the ruling which Cook attacked in an interview with the Irish Independent newspaper.
"No one did anything wrong here and we need to stand together. Ireland
is being picked on and this is unacceptable," the newspaper quoted him
saying. "It's total political crap."
Vestager has questioned how anyone might think an
arrangement that allowed the iPhone maker to pay a tax rate of 0.005 per
cent, as Apple's main Irish unit did in 2014, was fair.
She said on Thursday that the calculations were
based on data provided by Apple itself and evidence presented during
hearings on Apple tax issues in the United States.
Asked if she accepted Cook's comments on the
ruling, she told a news conference: "No, I will not. This is a decision
based on the facts of the case."
Transatlantic tension
The battle lines are forming on both sides of the
Atlantic. In Paris, French Finance Minister Michel Sapin backed
Vestager's view that Apple's Irish tax arrangements amounted to abnormal
state aid. "The European Commission is doing its job," he told a news
conference. "It's normal to make Apple pay normal taxes."
German Economy Minister Sigmar Gabriel also
supported the Commission on Tuesday. However, Britain - which voted in
June to leave the EU - has stayed out of the row, saying it is an issue
for the Irish government, Apple and the Commission.
Money or jobs?
Opinion is divided on the streets of Dublin. Some
argued Ireland had to keep drawing foreign investors with low tax rates
to provide jobs.
But others said the government should drop the idea of appealing the decision and take the money.
"They are doing the wrong thing. They don't care
about the normal people," said Louise O'Reilly, 57, a full-time carer
for her diabetic and partially blind mother. "The money should be spent
on the old-age pensioners who worked all their lives and are struggling
to survive."
O'Reilly's mother pays 10 euros tax on a monthly
pension of 1,050 euros ($1,170), a higher rate than the EU said Apple's
main Irish unit paid on its profits in 2014.
By contrast, Cook estimated Apple's average annual
tax on its global profits at 26 per cent. "They just picked a number
from I don't know where," he said. However, in a separate radio
interview he promised to boost tax payments by repatriating billions of
dollars in global profits to the United States next year.
"I think that Apple was targeted here," he said.
"And I think that (anti-US sentiment) is one reason why we could have
been targeted ... I think it's a desire to reallocate taxes that should
be paid in the US to the EU."
Apple would fight closely with Ireland to overturn
the ruling - by far the largest anti-competition measure imposed on a
company by the EU - which he said had "no basis in law or in fact".
Ireland considers appeal
Finance Minister Michael Noonan has insisted
Dublin would appeal any adverse ruling ever since the EU investigation
began in 2014.
However, the cabinet failed to agree on Wednesday
whether to accept his recommendation of an appeal. A group of
independent lawmakers represented in the minority coalition say they
need to consult further with Noonan, tax officials and independent
experts.
After five hours of discussion, the cabinet
adjourned until Friday when the government said a decision would be
made. Any failure of the Independent Alliance group to come on board
would cast doubt on the government's survival prospects.
Cook played down the possibility of the government failing to appeal the decision.
"The future investment for business really depends
on a level of certainty," he told RTE radio. "I'm pretty confident that
the government will do the right thing."
In Washington, US Treasury Secretary Jack Lew
criticised the ruling. "I have been concerned that it reflected an
attempt to reach into the US tax base to tax income that ought to be
taxed in the United States," he said on Wednesday.
Apple was found to be holding over $181 billion in
accumulated profits offshore, more than any US company, in a study
published last year by two left-leaning nonprofit groups, a policy
critics say is designed to avoid paying US taxes.
But Cook said part of the company's 2014 tax bill
would be paid next year when the company repatriates offshore profits to
the United States.
"We provisioned several billion dollars for the US
for payment as soon as we repatriate it and right now I forecast that
repatriation to occur next year," he told RTE.
No comments :
Post a Comment