TWO prominent businessmen, Samwel Shanshasen Lema, and Mohamed Mustafa Yusufali, appeared before the Kisutu Resident Magistrate’s Court in Dar es Salaam yesterday charged with 223 counts of conspiracy, forgery, money laundering, evading tax and occasioning loss of over 14bn/-.
They were not allowed to enter any plea
to the charges before Principal Resident Magistrate Wilbard Mashauri
because they have been charged under the Economic and Organised Crime
Control Act, which falls under the jurisdiction of the High Court.
The two were committed to remand custody
until July 28, when the prosecution will respond to the request by the
defence team, led by advocates Alex Mgongolwa, Hudson Ndusyepo and
Nehemia Nkonko, who are challenging the validity of the charge of money
laundering.
In the case, both accused persons are
facing one count of conspiracy to defraud, 181 counts of forging tax
invoices for two different companies, one count of money laundering and
one charge relating to occasioning of loss to a specified authority.
Lema, an Arusha based tycoon, separately
faces 38 counts of forging value added tax (VAT) returns and one count
of tax evasion. This case is the second for Yusufali, popularly known as
‘Mzee wa Milioni 7 kwa Dakika’, to face before the same court.
The first case involves tax evasion to
the tune of 15bn/-. During the court session, the prosecution team
comprised Senior State Attorney Mutalemwa Kishenyi and State Attorneys
Jacqueline Nyantori and Diana Rukondo and a prosecutor from the
Prevention and Combating of Corruption Bureau (PCCB) Leonard Swai.
The prosecution told the court that the
accused persons and other persons not in court conspired to defraud the
Tanzania Revenue Authority (TRA) of 14,052,011,435.69 between January 1,
2012 and December 3, 2014 within the cities of Arusha and Dar es
Salaam.
It is alleged that on diverse dates in
Dar es Salaam, the two accused persons made false tax invoices bearing
different numbers and dates, purporting to show that Northern
Engineering and Elerai Construction Co. Limited purchased commodities
from various companies worth billions of shillings.
The prosecution alleged further that on
different dates in the city, with intent to defraud, Lema made several
VAT returns for different months, purportedly showing that Northern
Engineering Works Limited during such months purchased commodities worth
billions of shillings, while it was false. Lema is also charged with
evading tax amounting to 14,052,011,435.69 between January 1, 2012 and
December 31, 2015 -- in Dar es Salaam.
Being director responsible for
management affairs of his companies, Northern Engineering Works Limited
and Elerai Construction Co. Limited, which are registered VAT payers,
with a view to fraudulently evade tax, he allegedly submitted to the
Commissioner of TRA false returns.
All the accused persons were charged
with an offence of money laundering allegedly committed between February
1, 2012 and February 25, 2013 within the cities of Arusha and Dar es
Salaam.
They are alleged to have directly
engaged themselves in a transaction of 420m/-, which, according to the
prosecution, was proceed of predicate offences by depositing the amount
in a bank account by the name Igba Jeferali Jafferjee at I and M Bank
(T) Limited and subsequently withdrawing the same in cash.
The prosecution told the court that at
the time of depositing and withdrawing of the money, the accused persons
knew or ought to have known that the said sum was proceeds of predicate
offences, which are forgery and tax evasion.
It is alleged further that between
January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2015, in the city, by reason of their
wilful acts, Lema and Yusufali submitted to the Commissioner General of
TRA false value added tax returns, hence the government to suffer a
pecuniary loss of 14,052,011,435.69.
Immediately after the prosecution had
read over the charges to the accused persons, Advocate Mgongolwa, on
behalf of the defence team, rose up and requested the court to strike
out the money laundering charge “because it was incurably defective’’.
“The defect goes straight to the
particulars of the offence. Those particulars of the offence are fatal
and cannot be cured under the law. Money laundering offence must contain
four elements like Illicit source Placement, layering and integration,”
Mr Mgongolwa argued.
Under the Anti-Money Laundering Act,
money laundering is defined as engagement of person(s), direct or
indirectly in conversion, transfer, concealment, disguising, use or
acquisition of money or property known to be of illicit origin and in
which such engagement intends to avoid legal consequence.
From such definition, he submitted, one
could rightly say that for there to be an offence of money laundering,
there must be intention on the part of the accused person to avoid the
legal consequences of such action -- hence, the intention forms a basic
element in particulars of the offence.
According to the advocates, looking at
the count, the particulars of the offence were insufficient to meet test
required under section 3 which defines the offence of money laundering
and constituent acts provided for under section 12 (a) (b) (c) and (d)
of the Anti-Money Laundering Act.
No comments :
Post a Comment