Money Markets
By EDWIN MUTAI, emutai@ke.nationmedia.com AND GEORGE NGIGI, gngigi@ke.nationmedia.com
In Summary
- Chief executives of commercial banks and other lending institutions will face a Sh1 million fine or imprisonment for a term of not less than one year or both if convicted of flouting the law.
- Mr Kenyatta had himself in 2011, while serving as Finance minister, opposed a similar Bill to regulate interest rates that was fronted by Gem MP Jakoyo Midiwo.
- Members of Parliament have been accused of using the emotive Bill to squeeze handouts from the cash-rich banking sector.
Parliament yesterday passed a Bill capping bank
interest rates at four per cent above the indicative Central Bank Rate
(CBR), taking the battle to bring down the cost of loans to the
doorsteps of President Uhuru Kenyatta, who must sign it before it can
become law.
Mr Kenyatta, like his predecessors who have twice rejected
similar Bills, presents the biggest obstacle to Parliament’s long-held
ambition of putting Kenya on a controlled interest rate regime — the
presidency being where the interests of the public, bankers and bank
owners converge.
If Mr Kenyatta immediately signs the Bill into law,
bank lending rates would be capped at 14.5 per cent based on the
current CBR of 10.5 per cent.
That would be significantly different from current
average lending rate of 18 per cent, as per Central Bank of Kenya (CBK)
data, with some borrowers paying as high as 24 per cent for short- to
medium-term loans.
The Bill, sponsored by Kiambu MP Jude Njomo, also
pegs the minimum interest rate payable on deposits held in interest
earning account at 70 per cent of the CBR — meaning at current rates
depositors would earn an interest of 7.3 per cent on their cash.
Treasury secretary Henry Rotich and CBK governor
Patrick Njoroge have already opposed the Bill, signalling it has a very
slim chance of getting Mr Kenyatta’s ascent.
“Capping interest rates would lead to
inefficiencies in the credit market, promote informal lending channels
that undermine the effectiveness of monetary policy transmission,” Dr
Njoroge said on Tuesday when he appeared before a parliamentary
committee.
Dr Njoroge, however, agrees that lending rates are too high and that banks should be persuaded to lower them.
Pleading with banks to lend at lower rates in the
recent past has, however, not borne fruit, leaving the lenders to charge
borrowers high and arbitrary rates that have only invited legislative
action from Parliament.
Mr Kenyatta had himself in 2011, while serving as
Finance minister, opposed a similar Bill to regulate interest rates that
was fronted by Gem MP Jakoyo Midiwo.
He failed to convince MPs to drop the Bill forcing
his bosses, then President Mwai Kibaki and Prime Minister Raila Odinga,
to step in to lobby the parliamentarians.
The Bill is the latest in a series of failed
attempts by the legislators to provide a legal mechanism to regulate
interest rates.
Mr Njomo’s amendment to the Banking Act is unique in its demand that chief executives of banks be held accountable for their institution’s failure to comply with the new law.
Mr Njomo’s amendment to the Banking Act is unique in its demand that chief executives of banks be held accountable for their institution’s failure to comply with the new law.
Using emotive Bill to squeeze handouts
“A bank or financial institution that contravenes
Section 33 (b) (2) of the Banking Act commit an offence and shall be
liable on conviction to a fine not less than Sh1 million or in default,
the chief executive officer will be imprisoned for a term not less than
one year,” the Bill says.
Members of Parliament have been accused of using the emotive Bill to squeeze handouts from the cash-rich banking sector.
Members of Parliament have been accused of using the emotive Bill to squeeze handouts from the cash-rich banking sector.
Dr Njoroge declined to disclose the current
borrowing trends in the banking sector, only stating the numbers had
shown a drastic slowdown that warrants interrogation.
No comments :
Post a Comment