By Silvia Mwendia
In Summary
- Telco giant’s launch of new products is carefully calculated to cement its market leadership.
Last week, telecoms giant Safaricom launched ‘Ready
Business’, a new business solution for small and medium enterprises
(SMEs) that sees the telco giant enter consultancy to drive future
growth, in a key strategic move to create a position in a new
high-growth market.
The new business solutions will see Safaricom provide SMEs
advisory and technology services. It will work by ranking an SME’s
processes against best global practices, offering a consultant to fill
in and advise on the identified gaps, and solutions that also span voice
and data bundles for both mobile and fixed lines, and M-Pesa payment
solutions.
These services are expected to help SMEs tackle their communication challenges.
“The ‘Ready Business’ platform seeks to empower
SMEs to become competitive, efficient and help them deliver better
experiences for their customers through the intelligent use of
technology,” said Rita Okuthe, director, Safaricom Consumer Business.
Over the years, Safaricom has grown to achieve
market dominance in both telecoms and in financial services through its
M-Pesa product.
According to the Quarterly Statistics Report Second
Quarter for the Financial Year 2015/2016, Safaricom leads the market
in the number of mobile subscriptions at 64.7 per cent and the same goes
for voice, messaging and data.
In mobile money, the brand leads with the value of
their mobile commerce standing at Sh253 billion in December 2015, far
ahead of the Sh12 billion posted by Airtel Money, which came in second.
Thus, the secret to Safaricom’s outstanding
performance has been growth in the telecoms market, followed
sequentially by a rise in the financial services market.
On this basis, the ‘Ready Business’ comes as both
an extended marketing tool in providing consultancy to SMEs that
highlights their needs for Safaricom products, and an entry into a new
sector of business consultancy.
It’s a portfolio strategy that aligns strongly with
the findings encapsulated in the Boston Matrix, a product portfolio
management and analysis tool, developed by Bruce Henderson, founder of
global consulting and management firm, Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
The Boston Matrix was designed to help companies
“decide which markets and business units to invest in”, according to an
article by Martin Reeves, Sandy Moose and Thijs Venema in a 2014 article
titled “BCG Classics Revisited: The Growth Share Matrix” and published
on the website BCG Perspectives .
The matrix was based on the factors of company
competitiveness and market attractiveness “with the underlying drivers
for these factors being relative market share and growth rate”.
Problem child
In their 2014 article, the three authors explain the reasoning behind the Boston Matrix.
“The logic was that market leadership, expressed
through high relative (market) share, resulted in sustainably superior
returns. In the long run, the market leader obtained a self-reinforcing
cost advantage through scale and experience that competitors found
difficult to replicate.”
The matrix is divided into four quadrants on a
market-growth (vertical axis) versus market share (horizontal axis) that
explain the product life cycle. In the first quadrant is the ‘question
marks’ or ‘problem child’.
Here the market growth is high, but the market share of each
participant is low — everyone is a beginner at this stage in a new or
emerging market, such as SME services in Kenya.
It is advised that these business units should
either be concertedly invested in, or discarded, depending on their
potential of moving into the second quadrant called ‘stars’.
In the stars phase, products experience high growth and move to achieving a high market share.
According to the Oxford Learning Lab, a
subscription video streaming service providing marketing knowledge,
stars should be invested in so as to maintain their leadership status in
the market.
Next up is the cash cow. Here, the market growth is low, but the market share of key firms remains relatively high.
“These units usually generate cash in excess, but
opportunities or new investments are limited, due to the low growing
market,” said Oxford Learning Lab.
Cash cows should be milked by using the money made
to sustain stars, and invest in new product development and grow problem
children that have the chance of becoming stars.
Strategic path
The last quadrant is the ‘dog’ or ‘pet’. In this phase, the product is in a low market growth and it has a low market share.
“Pets’ are essentially worthless and should be
liquidated, divested, or repositioned given that their current
positioning is unlikely to ever generate cash,” said Reeves, Moose and
Venema.
Whether Safaricom is applying this matrix
intentionally or not, its strategic path to date has demonstrated the
application of investments that open up new market segments for the
telco.
Such moves a key to long term brand success, in
that firms never know when saturation could hit their current market,
according to Mudit Sharma, a project manager at Dalberg-a global
development advisory firm.
“We can never be a 100 per cent sure about what is
their exact motivation, but it seems that it is a good approach. Even if
their market has not hit saturation point and there is potential for
growth, every company has to pursue new markets and new segments,” he
said.
However, the business environment today is not what
it was in the 1970s when the matrix was developed bringing into
question the relevance of this strategy three decades later.
As Reeves, Moose and Venema write in their article, today’s
marketplace moves faster and is more unpredictable. Data also indicates
that “market share is no longer a strong predictor of performance.”
In an analysis of publicly listed companies from 1980 to
2012, BCG discovered a collapse in the relationship between relative
market share and sustained competitiveness.
- African Laughter
No comments :
Post a Comment