Opinion and Analysis
By ANDREW WARAMBO
In Summary
It has been famously said that the art of taxation
consists in so plucking the goose as to obtain the largest possible
amount of feathers with the smallest possible amount of hissing.
If that is indeed the case, the President’s directive to the
National Treasury to exempt low income earners from paying taxes on
bonuses, overtime and retirement benefits is bound to elicit no hissing
at all.
In a country in which the tax bands and the amount
of annual personal relief have remained the same for over a decade, the
directive has largely been celebrated. However, the move raises
important questions.
What overall policy considerations informed it?
How will it be implemented administratively to ensure that only those
targeted by it benefit? Identifying “low-income earners” and the quantum
and nature of their earnings is bound to be a task fraught with
difficulties.
It is also necessary to consider the unintended
foreseeable consequences of the directive. Almost overnight, a large
number of people will have additional funds and the classic dilemma of
whether to spend, save or invest these will come into play.
At this stage it is unclear which of these
alternative outcomes the technocrats at the National Treasury would
prefer and how they intend to “steer” action towards their preference.
Regardless of the option selected, the move will
have an impact on several economic factors including inflation and
interest rates hence it will be interesting to see if and how these
choices have been considered in the wider economic and fiscal policy
context.
Despite the good intention behind it, the
President’s directive is likely to be as useful as a handbrake on a
canoe. Employees are the most visible, stable group of taxpayers in the
country.
They have very limited options if any at all, when
it comes to tax planning hence they represent a dependable source of tax
revenue. For a long time they have therefore been treated as such.
The country’s employee tax regime requires major
surgery in form of an overhaul and not merely piecemeal reform. Consider
the fact that any employee earning over Sh11,135 per month pays taxes
and has the obligation to file tax returns.
Moreover, prior to 2014, a low income earner was
defined as any employee earning Sh 29, 316 per month or below. This is
merely Sh 9,576 less than the current earnings threshold for the top tax
bracket of 30 per cent.
This is grossly out of touch with the current
economic circumstances. Seemingly addressing the needs of one class of
taxpayers, while remaining silent on all the others is not sustainable
in the long term.
We have a stretched middle class that has been
hard-hit by inflation, the rising cost of living, and increased levels
of consumption taxes and levies over the last two decades.
Additionally, the needs and concerns of the higher income earners ought to be given consideration.
All three categories of earners have a symbiotic
relationship and therefore the system in place ought to be based on and
uphold the principles of equity
No comments :
Post a Comment