Mr Geoffrey Kiplagat before the Tunoi tribunal in Nairobi on April 12, 2016. PHOTO | JEFF ANGOTE
By SANDRA CHAO-BLASTO, schao@ke.nationmedia.com
In Summary
Suspended Supreme Court judge Philip Tunoi’s
advocate, Fred Ngatia, has sought to discredit the testimony of a former
radio journalist who claims to have facilitated the payment of a Sh200
million bribe to the judge to influence an election petition filed
against Nairobi governor Evans Kidero.
The senior counsel Tuesday pressed Geoffrey Kiplagat hard to
elaborate on the contents of his affidavit, terming his allegations
“fiction”.
“Basically from what you have just said, you had no
role at the petrol station because no such incident took place. It is
just a creation of your mind,” Mr Ngatia told the former Kass FM
presenter.
Mr Kiplagat, however, maintained that on the day of
the alleged bribery he was picked from Kasuku Centre in Kileleshwa,
Nairobi, by lawyer Katwa Kigen who was driving a Mercedes Benz, with the
judge seated at the back.
He claims that after a briefcase changed hands at
the petrol station in Westlands, he was dropped off on Wayaki Way and
given Sh20,000 to attend a funeral.
Mr Ngatia questioned Mr Kiplagat’s memory over the actual size of the briefcase and whether or not he was privy to the contents.
The former journalist told the Sharad Rao-led
tribunal that he had indeed sworn the affidavit in 2014 even though the
bribery allegations against Mr Justice Tunoi only surfaced last year.
In the heat of cross-examination Mr Kiplagat
clarified that while there were several meetings held between the
parties, the judge did not show up to some of the meetings held in
Nairobi and Eldoret.
The tribunal, which includes retired judge Jonathan
Havelock, Justice Roseline Korir, lawyer Judith Guserwa, Mr James
Kaberere Gacoka, Mr Abdirashid Abdullahi Hussein and Mr George Munji
Wakukha, began their sittings Tuesday at the Anniversary Towers in
Nairobi.
The suspended judge through his lawyer asked the
tribunal to put off further cross examination of Mr Kiplagat until the
people who had been mentioned in his testimony had an opportunity to
record their statements and appear before the tribunal for
clarifications if need be.
“Every statement he gives leads to another human
being, there is already a distinct possibility of him being recalled. It
would be prudent to put off his cross examination until the individuals
mentioned give their statements,” he said.
Lawyer Paul Nyamodi acting as the tribunal’s
assisting counsel, however, objected to the proposal, saying that it
would be prudent to finish with one witness before moving on to the
next.
“All witnesses flow from this witness and the
tribunal would not have a tidy record if we are to bring in a second
witness then recall this one,” he said.
The next tribunal sittings were adjourned to April 26.
No comments :
Post a Comment