The Kenya Airports Authority (KAA) chairman David Kimaiyo. PHOTO | FILE
By GERALD ANDAE, gandae@ke.nationmedia.com
In Summary
The Kenya Airports Authority (KAA) has ruled out
compensation to a Chinese firm whose contract to build new terminal at
Jomo Kenyatta International Airport in Nairobi was cancelled, signalling
a legal battle.
KAA chairman David Kimaiyo told the Business Daily that the Chinese firm did not deserve compensation and that the State is the aggrieved party.
The KAA said it shelved plans for a new terminal
building at JKIA, whose construction President Uhuru Kenyatta launched
in December 2013, due to financial pressures and excess capacity caused
by recent upgrades to existing facilities.
China’s Anhui Construction and China National
Aero-Technology International Engineering Corporation (Catic) had been
selected to build the Sh56 billion terminal, which was expected to
handle 20 million passengers a year.
Mr Kimaiyo reckons that the contractor failed to
secure financial guarantees and had been paid more than the works
handled at the port.
“There is no compensation, and those aggrieved can
go to court. We are the aggrieved party here,” said Mr Kimaiyo in
telephone interview.
The contractor is said to have been paid $4 million
(Sh406 million). The Chinese firms are said to have dug the project
foundation and mobilised 90 per cent of the required equipment.
The Attorney General’s office said the KAA did not
seek legal advice before terminating the contract, exposing the taxpayer
to the burden of footing the heavy litigation and damage fees
associated with the legal battle should the courts decide in the
contractor’s favour.
The Greenfield project was to turn the JKIA into
Africa’s largest aviation facility in line with Kibaki administration’s
vision of making Nairobi the region’s air transport hub.
Termination of the project also dampens the intense
infrastructure expansion drive that the Jubilee administration launched
upon coming to power in 2013.
Termination of the airport contract also came as a
surprise to potential financiers of the plan, among them the African
Development Bank (AfDB).
Gabriel Negatu, AfDB regional director, said the
bank had initiated preliminary discussions with the KAA for funding but
had not been informed of the termination.
Such projects come with huge equipment costs and
the fact that the contractor had done almost all the basics means the
KAA may have to foot the demobilisation bill.
The Greenfield project has been dogged by a series
of disputes, including the controversial award of the tender that at one
point implicated former KAA managers in corrupt deals before the Ethics
and Anti-Corruption Commission cleared them.
No comments :
Post a Comment